BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional movement reconstruction systems, based on the use of infrared cameras capable of recognizing and capturing 3-D movement, are the standard in the biomechanical study of sporting actions. In this study, the knowledge and expertise inherent in sports medicine and engineering applied to sport were used for occupational risk assessment. In Italy, in 2020, muscularticular problems accounted for 69% of the problems reported to INAIL: these pathologies are correlated with bad posture. Using a methodology peculiar to sports medicine applied in the study of postural adjustment and gait analysis, therefore, the different working postures assumed at the video terminal typically employed by the staff of the leading international “E-commerce company” were subjected to analysis.METHODS: Four subjects (2 males and 2 females; age: 33.0± 12.9 years; stature 175.6± 0.07 cm; body weight 70.8± 8.87 kg) were evaluated in the laboratory of the Institute of Sports Medicine and Science of CONI by a three-dimensional optoelectronic system (SMART-DX 7000, BTS Bioengineering, Milan, Italy).RESULTS: The video terminal stations were characterized by three work surfaces of different heights: 73 cm for “sitting” positions, 100cm and 110cm for “standing” positions. The postures for the “sitting” position: 1) standard: correct posture as per D.Lgs.81/08; 2) leaning: with head bent forward towards the monitor; 3) slouching: “tired at the end of the day” and for the “standing” positions: 4) standard: correct posture; 5) leaning: with head bent forward towards the monitor. The angles (at knee, elbows, ankles, back created between C7-sacro-knee, head, visual, head-shoulder) and distances (forehead-monitor; acromion-monitor) were measured.CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the data collected compared the different postures with the standard sitting position, the normative term of reference. The best “standing” posture is the one that also includes a rest under one of the feet, which brings the angles studied closer to those of the standard position. The standing position alone, however, exposes the back to “overload” and, therefore, the use of a bar stool of between about 72 to 85 cm high is suggested. This paper demonstrates how the methodology of movement analysis typical of sports medicine integrates with the ergonomic assessment needs of occupational medicine, needs that are and will become increasingly important in the management of workers who are called upon to extend their careers well beyond the age of 60.