To report a case of coronary-subclavian steal syndrome (CSSS) due to a history of a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to left anterior descending (LAD) artery coronary bypass (CABG) and a heavily calcified ostial left subclavian artery (LSA) occlusion, that was treated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) technique and to summarize the current trends of IVL treatment for supra-aortic vessels. A 64-year-old woman with progressive intermittent angina pectoris and a history of LIMA to LAD bypass underwent coronary angiography which demonstrated complete ostial occlusion of the LSA. Via brachial access, the patient underwent Shockwave IVL balloon treatment of the LSA and stent-graft implantation. At 9 months follow-up, the patient showed symptoms resolution, and duplex ultrasound (DUS) demonstrated a patent LSA. The Shockwave IVL system was demonstrated to be a feasible treatment and justified for selective cases of highly calcified lesions in supra-aortic vessels. The present case report and the literature review, in a total of 47 patients resulted in a high technical procedural success rate, with a low rate of complications. Future studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these findings and standardize this technology in this particular vascular field. The present study exemplifies a case of recanalization of the left subclavian artery in a patient with coronary-subclavian steal syndrome with a heavily calcified ostial lesion treated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). In this paper, for the first time, a review of the contemporary literature on the use of IVL in supra-aortic vessels is reported, elucidating the feasibility of this technique in this vascular territory. Despite the heterogeneous features of the reported cases and the lack of a standardized protocol for the use of IVL in the management of highly calcified lesions of supra-aortic vessels, it was demonstrated to be a feasible technique, with a high technical success rate, being an advantageous tool for heavily calcified supra-aortic lesions.

We present a case of successful endovascular repair of late ruptured aortic anastomotic pseudoaneurysm following previous left subclavian artery-descending thoracic aorta bypass and concomitant emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of complicated endovascular aortic de-coarctation never previously described is also presented. A review of the intraoperative, 30-day, and follow-up morbidity, mortality, and complications of TEVAR as endovascular treatment of late aneurysm/pseudoaneurysms after surgical aortic de-coarctation was also performed. The systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and following PICO model. A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science using the words "tevar of late complication of aortic coarctation surgical repair" and "endovascular repair of anastomotic pseudoaneurysm in coarctation" up to June 17, 2022. Data were extracted from study documents about study design, patient's demographics and comorbidities, details about primary surgical repair, type of late complication, time between open surgery and occurrence of complications, details of the secondary endovascular procedure with technical success, early, and follow-up mortality and morbidity. A total of 18 papers were included with 78 patients (48 men, 69.5%). The most frequent type of primary open surgical repair was patch aortoplasty (46, 58.9%). Focusing on aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm as late complications, most of the patients were asymptomatic (45, 57.7%). All patients underwent TEVAR, 14 of them (17.9%) in urgent/emergent setting. The technical success was 98.7%, with 1 intraoperative death due to rupture of the aorta. In total, 31 patients out of 78 (39.7%) showed different complications in the immediate postoperative time, with type II endoleak being the most observed (8/31, 25.8%). The mean follow-up time was about 2 years (26.5 months, range 3-92). Overall, 30-day mortality was 2.6%. Complications occurred in 30 patients (39.4%), 23 of them resolved during the follow-up period. With the limit of low-quality data, TEVAR can be considered a safe and effective option for the treatment of late complications after open surgery for aortic coarctation, even in urgent settings. Different specialists have to face the technical complexities and risks related to treatment of late complications after surgical de-coartaction, which can be either surgical or endovascular, and depend on patient's ages. Although covered stents appear to have some protection from the development of stent fractures, doesn't provide complete protection from late aneurysm formation. In this setting, TEVAR may represent a valuable option, combining the advantages of the covered stent with those of a device that can cover a wider range of aortic length, especially in adult patients. This study shows thoracic endovascular repair can be considered a safe and effective option in clincal practice for the treatment of late complications after open surgery for AC, even in urgent settings.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the pressure gradient on papilledema after stenting in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients and venous sinus stenosis (VSS). In this prospective cohort study, we examined 121 patients with IIH and VSS who underwent stenting. The papilledema Frisen grade at the 1-month follow-up was used as a grouping factor (favorable outcome: 0-1; unfavorable outcome: 2-5). We used multivariable logistic regression modeling to determine independent predictors of favorable outcome. The performance of the prediction model was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A total of 96 patients had papilledema grades 0 to 1, and 25 patients had papilledema grades 2 to 5. Patients with the first group had significantly lower gradient pressures preoperatively (15.2 mmHg vs. 21.4 mmHg, p=0.001) and postoperatively (2 mmHg vs. 3.3 mmHg, p=0.002) relative to those in the second group. Multivariate analysis indicated that preoperative pressure gradient (odds ratio [OR] = 1.119; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.034-1.211]) and postoperative pressure gradient (OR = 1.498; 95% CI = 1.147-1.957) were independent predictors of favorable outcome. In the ROC analysis, the cut-off pressure gradient for the highest sensitivity (0.44) and specificity (0.874) was 22.75 mmHg, with a Youden's index of 0.314. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with a preoperative pressure gradient <22.75 mmHg had more rapid improvement of papilledema than did those with a pressure gradient >22.75 mmHg (mean+SD: 2.639+0.382 [95% CI: 1.890-3.388] versus mean+SD: 3.882+0.884 [95% CI: 2.149-5.616]; p=0.004). A significant reduction in the pressure gradient appears to be strongly correlated with the success of VSS in patients with IIH. A higher preoperative pressure gradient may reduce stenting efficacy in patients with IIH. Venous sinus stenting has the potential to yield substantial clinical advantages in individuals diagnosed with idiopathic intracranial hypertension with venous sinus stenosis. Nevertheless, a heightened preoperative pressure gradient could lead to less favorable results. Thus, the early adoption of venous sinus stenting is advised to avert additional irreversible clinical deterioration among idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients with venous sinus stenosis.

Endovascular therapies (EVTs) for symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) are efficient and minimally invasive. However, patients with PAD tend to have high bleeding risk (HBR), and there are limited data regarding the HBR for patients with PAD after EVT. In this study, we investigated the prevalence and severity of HBR, as well as its association with clinical outcomes in the patients with PAD who underwent EVT. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria were applied to 732 consecutive patients with lower extremity PAD post-EVT to assess the prevalence of HBR, and its association with major bleeding events, all-cause mortality, and ischemic events. The ARC-HBR scores (1 point for each major criterion and 0.5 points for each minor criterion) were obtained and the patients were divided into four groups (score: 0-0.5; low risk, score: 1-1.5; moderate risk, score: 2-2.5; high risk, and score: ≥3; very high risk) according to the score. Major bleeding events were defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type-3 or type-5 bleeding, and ischemic events were defined as the composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and acute limb ischemia within 2 years. High bleeding risk occurred in 78.8% of the patients. Major bleeding events, all-cause mortality, and ischemic events occurred in 9.7%, 18.7%, and 6.4% of the study cohort, respectively, within 2 years. During the follow-up period, major bleeding events significantly increased with the ARC-HBR score. The severity of the ARC-HBR score was significantly associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events (high risk: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.28, 24.62]; p=0.022; very high risk: adjusted HR: 10.37; 95% CI: [2.32, 46.30]; p=0.002). All-cause mortality and ischemic events also significantly increased with higher ARC-HBR score. High bleeding risk patients with lower extremity PAD can be at a high risk of bleeding events, mortality, and ischemic events after EVT. The ARC-HBR criteria and its associated scores can successfully stratify HBR patients and assess the bleeding risk in patients with lower extremity PAD who undergo EVT. Endovascular therapies (EVTs) for symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) are efficient and minimally invasive. However, patients with PAD tend to have high bleeding risk (HBR), and there are limited data regarding the HBR for patients with PAD after EVT. Post EVT, most of the patients with PAD were classified as having HBR using the Academic Research Consortium for HBR (ARC-HBR) criteria and the rate of bleeding events as well as mortality and ischemic events within 2 years increased as the ARC-HBR score increased in this retrospective study of 732 participants. HBR patients with PAD can be at high risk of not only bleeding events but also mortality and ischemic events in the mid-term. The ARC-HBR criteria and its associated scores can successfully stratify HBR patients and assess the bleeding risk in patients with PAD who underwent EVT.

The aim of this study was to present the short-term and 2-year outcomes after use of the Bentley BeGraft as bridging stent-graft (BSG) for reno-visceral target vessel (TV) during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) from a contemporary multicentric experience. A retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent elective FEVAR at 7 institutions located in Italy from 2015 to 2021 was performed. The main outcomes of interest for this study were technical success and TV instability, defined in accordance with current reporting standards. Patients' survival was also assessed. Overall, 81 patients received elective FEVAR during the study period. Mean age of patients was 78 years, and 89% were men. Most patients were treated for a juxta-pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (68%), and 23% had already received an infrarenal aortic reconstruction. Most endografts had 3-vessel or 4-vessel design (27% and 55%, respectively), and a Cook endograft was used in 73% of cases. Overall, 266 Bentley BeGraft were implanted, of which 44 (16.5%) in the celiac trunk, 69 (26%) in the superior mesenteric artery, 79 (29.5%) in the right renal artery, and 74 (28%) in the left renal artery. Technical success was 94%, with 5 instances of technical failure that were recorded and required an additional intraoperative procedure. The early mortality rate was 4%, and acute kidney injury occurred in 14 cases with 1 requiring definitive hemodialysis. Survival at 6, 12, and 24 months in the overall cohort was 98.8%, 95.3%, and 83.4%, respectively. Freedom from TV instability at 6, 12, and 24 months in the overall cohort was 98.4%, 97.9%, and 97.2%, respectively. Events of TV instability included 3 cases of type 1C endoleak and 3 cases of type 3C endoleak, while no events of BSG fracture or thrombosis were noted. Five out of 6 cases of TV instability occurred in renal arteries, and they were all successfully treated by endovascular means. The data from this multicentric study show favorable short-term and 2-year outcomes of the Bentley BeGraft as BSG for reno-visceral TV during FEVAR, with low rates of TV-related endoleak and no stent occlusion up to 2 years. The data from this multicentric study show satsfactory outcomes up to two years of follow-up for the Bentley BeGraft when used for brdiging reno-visceral vessels during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. Further research will be needed to identify predictors of stent-related reinterventions and ascertain the long-term durability.

Hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch aneurysms is a minimally invasive procedure with improved results. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and expand the possibilities of zone 1 and 2 landing TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) using our treatment strategy. This retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study included 213 patients (TBAD, n=69; thoracic arch aneurysm [TAA], n=144; median age, 72 years; median follow-up period, 6 years) from May 2008 to February 2020. The following conditions were satisfied before performing zone 1 and 2 landing TEVAR: TBAD; proximal landing zone (LZ): diameter <37 mm, length >15 mm, and nondissection area, proximal stent-graft: size ≤40 mm and oversizing rate: 10% to 20%, and TAA; proximal LZ: diameter ≤42 mm and length >15 mm, proximal stent-graft: size ≤46 mm and oversizing rate: 10% to 20%. Of the 69 patients in the TBAD group, 34 (49.3%) had patent false lumen (PFL), and 35 (50.7%) had false lumen partial thrombosis (FLPT), including ulcer-like projections. Emergency procedures were performed in 33 (15.5%) patients. There were no significant differences in the in-hospital mortality (TBAD: 1.5% vs TAA: 0.7%, p=0.544) or the in-hospital aortic complications (TBAD: n=1 vs TAA: n=5, p=0.666). Retrograde type A dissection was not observed in the TBAD group. The aortic event-free rates at 10 years were 89.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.7%-95.3%) and 87.9% (95% CI: 80.3%-92.8%) in the TBAD and TAA groups, respectively (log-rank p=0.636). In the TBAD group, the early and late outcomes were not significantly different between the PFL and FLPT groups. Satisfactory early and long-term results were obtained with zone 1 and 2 landing TEVAR. The TBAD cases had the same good results as the TAA cases. Using our strategy, we especially might reduce complications and be an effective treatment for acute complicated TBAD. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and expand the possibilities of zones 1 and 2 landing TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) using our treatment strategy. Satisfactory early and long-term results in the TBAD and thoracic arch aneurysm (TAA) groups were obtained with zones 1 and 2 landing TEVAR. The TBAD cases had the same good results as the TAA cases. Using our strategy, we especially might reduce complications and be an effective treatment for acute complicated TBAD.

To describe the transaxillary branch-to-branch-to-branch carotid catheterization technique (tranaxillary 3BRA-CCE IT) for cannulation of all supra-aortic vessels using only 1 femoral and 1 axillary access during triple-branch arch repair. After deployment of the triple-branch arch device, catheterization and bridging of the innominate artery (IA) should be performed through a right axillary access (cutdown or percutaneous). Then, the retrograde left subclavian (LSA) branch should be catheterized (if not preloaded) from a percutaneous femoral access, and a 12×90Fr sheath should be advanced to the outside of the endograft. Subsequently, catheterization of the left common carotid artery (LCCA) antegrade branch should be performed, followed by snaring of a wire in the ascending aorta which was inserted through the axillary access, creating a branch-to-branch-to-branch through-and-through guidewire. Over the axillary access, a 12×45Fr sheath should be inserted into the IA branch and looped in the ascending aorta using a push-and-pull technique so that it faces the LCCA branch, allowing for stable catheterization of the LCCA. The retrograde LSA branch should then be bridged following the standard fashion. This series of 5 patients demonstrates that triple-branch arch repair can be performed with the transaxillary 3BRA-CCE IT, allowing catheterization of the supra-aortic vessels without manipulation of the carotid arteries. The transaxillary 3BRA-CCE IT allows catheterization and bridging of all supra-aortic vessels in triple-branch arch repair through only 2 vascular access points, the femoral artery and the right axillary artery. This technique avoids carotid surgical cutdown and manipulation during these procedures, reducing the risk of access site complications, including bleeding and reintervention, reintubation, cranial nerve lesions, increased operating time, and so on, and has the potential to change the current vascular access standard used during triple-branch arch repair.

Visceral stents in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) have a significant risk of complications and carry a considerable burden of reinterventions. The aim of this study is to identify preoperative and intraoperative predictors of visceral stent failure. A retrospective review of 75 consecutive FEVARs in a single center from 2013 to 2021 was undertaken. Data on mortality, stent failure, and reintervention pertaining to 226 visceral stents were collected. Anatomical features including aortic neck angulation, aneurysm diameter, and angulation of target viscerals were obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Stent oversizing and intraprocedural complications were recorded. Postoperative CT scans were analyzed to determine the length of cover of target vessels. Only bridging stents through fenestrations to visceral vessels were considered; 28 (37%) cases had 4 visceral stents, 24 (32%) had 3, 19 (25%) had 2, 4 (5%) had 1. Thirty day mortality was 8%, a third of which was related to visceral stent complications. Intraprocedural complexity was documented during the cannulation of 8 (3.5%) target vessels, with a technical success rate of 98.7%. A significant endoleak or visceral stent failure was identified in 22 stents (9.8%) postoperatively, of which 7 (3%) had in-patient reintervention within 30 days. Further reinterventions at 1, 2, and 3 years were 12 (5.4%), 2 (1%), and 1 (0.4%), respectively. Most reinterventions were for renal stents (n=19, 86%). A smaller stent diameter and a shorter length of visceral stent were significant predictors of failure. No other anatomical feature or stent choice was found to be a significant predictor of failure. The modality of visceral stent failures varies, but renal stents with a smaller diameter and/or shorter length are more likely to fail over time. Their complications and reinterventions are common and carry a significant burden; therefore, close surveillance must be continued long term. With this work we share the methodology adopted at our centre to treat juxtarenal aneurysm with FEVAR. Thanks to this detailed review of anatomical and technical features we provide guidance for endovascular surgeons to face hostile aneurysm with peculiar visceral vessels anatomy. With our findings will also motivate industries in their attempt to produce improved technologies able to overcome issues identified in this paper.

We describe the feasibility and early results of a novel endovascular approach with a surgeon-modified fenestrated iliac stent graft to preserve pelvic perfusion in patients with iliac aneurysms not suitable for iliac branch devices (IBDs). Seven high-risk patients, median age 76 years (range 63-83), with a complex aortoiliac anatomy with contraindications for commercially available IBDs were treated with a novel surgeon-modified fenestrated iliac stent graft between August 2020 and November 2021. The modified device was built using an iliac limb stent graft (Endurant II Stent Graft; Medtronic), which was partially deployed, surgically fenestrated with a scalpel, reinforced, re-sheathed, and inserted via femoral access. The internal iliac artery was cannulated and bridged with a covered stent. Technical success rate was 100%. After a median follow-up period of 10 months, there was 1 type II endoleak and no migrations, stent fractures, or loss of device integrity. One iliac limb occlusion occurred after 7 months, which needed a secondary endovascular intervention, restoring patency. Surgeon-modified fenestrated iliac stent graft is feasible and might be used as an alternative in patients with a complex iliac anatomy not suitable to commercially available IBDs. Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate stent graft patency and potential complications. Surgeon modified fenetrated iliac stent grafts might be a promising alternative to iliac branch devices, extending endovascular solutions to a broader patient population with complex aorto-iliac anatomies preserving antegrade internal iliac artery perfusion. It is possible to treat small iliac bifurcations and large angulations of the iliac bifurcation safely and there is no need for a contralateral or upper-extremity access.

Stroke is among the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. The coexistence of bilateral carotid and vertebral artery (VA) occlusion and/or stenosis is in the very rare entity group in the literature. Here, we present a case with bilateral carotid artery occlusion and bilateral VA stenosis, who presented with an atypical clinical presentation and underwent bilateral vertebral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting in the same session. A 67 year old male patient was brought to the emergency department with complaints of inability to speak and weakness in both legs for 1 day. There were bilateral infarct areas in the anterior cerebral artery region and an additional infarct area in the left middle cerebral artery region. First, the right VA stenosis level was crossed using a 0.14 guidewire. After PTA, balloon-expandable stenting was performed with a 3.0×12 mm NC (non-compliant) balloon, and nearly complete recanalization was observed. Therefore, it was decided to perform an intervention on the left VA in the same session. As in this example case, in cases where cerebral perfusion is severely impaired, medical treatment after recanalization may be one of the best treatment options. The carotid arteries are the main arteries supplying the anterior circulation, and the vertebral arteries supply blood to the posterior circulation. However, in cases where both carotid arteries are occluded/dysfunctional, all cerebral perfusion remains over the vertebrobasilar system. However, in cases such as this, where both carotid arteries are occluded/dysfunctional, all cerebral perfusion remains over the vertebrobasilar system and may be responsible for anterior circulation strokes. The situation becomes more severe if both vertebral artery critical stenosis is added. Synchronous carotid and vertebral artery revascularization is not recommended in the guidelines for patients with combined carotid and vertebral artery disease. In patients with four-vessel occlusion/stenosis, as in this particular case, the intervention method and priorities are unclear. We achieved a favorable clinical outcome with simultaneous bilateral vertebral artery angioplasty and stenting, a hazardous method that can be a guide as an approach option in similar cases.