Temporal graphs are graphs whose topology is subject to discrete changes over time. Given a static underlying graph G, a temporal graph is represented by assigning a set of integer time-labels to every edge e of G, indicating the discrete time steps at which e is active. We introduce and study the complexity of a natural temporal extension of the classical graph problem Maximum Matching, taking into account the dynamic nature of temporal graphs. In our problem, Maximum Temporal Matching, we are looking for the largest possible number of time-labeled edges (simply time-edges) (e,t) such that no vertex is matched more than once within any time window of Δ consecutive time slots, where Δ∈N is given. We prove strong computational hardness results for Maximum Temporal Matching, even for elementary cases, as well as fixed-parameter algorithms with respect to natural parameters and polynomial-time approximation algorithms.

We present a linear-time, space and communication data-oblivious algorithm for securely merging two private, sorted lists into a single sorted, secret-shared list in the two party setting. Although merging two sorted lists can be done insecurely in linear time, previous secure merge algorithms all require super-linear time and communication. A key feature of our construction is a novel method to obliviously traverse permuted lists in sorted order. Our algorithm only requires black-box use of the underlying additively homomorphic cryptosystem and generic secure computation protocols for comparison and equality testing.

We identify two new clusters of proof complexity measures equal up to polynomial and log⁡n factors. The first cluster contains the logarithm of tree-like resolution size, regularized clause and monomial space, and clause space, ordinary and regularized, in regular and tree-like resolution. Consequently, separating clause or monomial space from the logarithm of tree-like resolution size is equivalent to showing strong trade-offs between clause space and length, and equivalent to showing super-critical trade-offs between clause space and depth. The second cluster contains width, Σ2 space (a generalization of clause space to depth 2 Frege systems), ordinary and regularized, and the logarithm of tree-like R(log⁡) size. As an application, we improve a known size-space trade-off for polynomial calculus with resolution. We further show a quadratic lower bound on tree-like resolution size for formulas refutable in clause space 4, and introduce a measure intermediate between depth and the logarithm of tree-like resolution size.

We study two “above guarantee” versions of the classical Longest Path problem on undirected and directed graphs and obtain the following results. In the first variant of Longest Path that we study, called Longest Detour, the task is to decide whether a graph has an (s,t)-path of length at least distG(s,t)+k. Bezáková et al. [7] proved that on undirected graphs the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT). Our first main result establishes a connection between Longest Detour on directed graphs and 3- Disjoint Paths on directed graphs. Using these new insights, we design a 2O(k)⋅nO(1) time algorithm for the problem on directed planar graphs. Furthermore, the new approach yields a significantly faster FPT algorithm on undirected graphs. In the second variant of Longest Path, namely Longest Path above Diameter, the task is to decide whether the graph has a path of length at least diam(G)+k. We obtain dichotomy results about Longest Path above Diameter on undirected and directed graphs.

Grid graphs, and, more generally, $k\times r$ grid graphs, form one of the most basic classes of geometric graphs. Over the past few decades, a large body of works studied the (in)tractability of various computational problems on grid graphs, which often yield substantially faster algorithms than general graphs. Unfortunately, the recognition of a grid graph is particularly hard -- it was shown to be NP-hard even on trees of pathwidth 3 already in 1987. Yet, in this paper, we provide several positive results in this regard in the framework of parameterized complexity (additionally, we present new and complementary hardness results). Specifically, our contribution is threefold. First, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) parameterized by $k+\mathsf {mcc}$ where $\mathsf{mcc}$ is the maximum size of a connected component of $G$. This also implies that the problem is FPT parameterized by $\mathtt{td}+k$ where $\mathtt{td}$ is the treedepth of $G$ (to be compared with the hardness for pathwidth 2 where $k=3$). Further, we derive as a corollary that strip packing is FPT with respect to the height of the strip plus the maximum of the dimensions of the packed rectangles, which was previously only known to be in XP. Second, we present a new parameterization, denoted $a_G$, relating graph distance to geometric distance, which may be of independent interest. We show that the problem is para-NP-hard parameterized by $a_G$, but FPT parameterized by $a_G$ on trees, as well as FPT parameterized by $k+a_G$. Third, we show that the recognition of $k\times r$ grid graphs is NP-hard on graphs of pathwidth 2 where $k=3$. Moreover, when $k$ and $r$ are unrestricted, we show that the problem is NP-hard on trees of pathwidth 2, but trivially solvable in polynomial time on graphs of pathwidth 1.

We aim at investigating the solvability/insolvability of nondeterministic logarithmic-space (NL) decision, search, and optimization problems parameterized by size parameters using simultaneously polynomial time and space on multi-tape deterministic Turing machines. We are particularly focused on a special NL-complete problem, 2SAT---the 2CNF Boolean formula satisfiability problem---parameterized by the number of Boolean variables. It is shown that 2SAT with $n$ variables and $m$ clauses can be solved simultaneously polynomial time and $(n/2^{c\sqrt{\log{n}}})\, polylog(m+n)$ space for an absolute constant $c>0$. This fact inspires us to propose a new, practical working hypothesis, called the linear space hypothesis (LSH), which states that 2SAT$_3$---a restricted variant of 2SAT in which each variable of a given 2CNF formula appears at most 3 times in the form of literals---cannot be solved simultaneously in polynomial time using strictly sub-linear (i.e., $m(x)^{\varepsilon}\, polylog(|x|)$ for a certain constant $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$) space on all instances $x$. An immediate consequence of this working hypothesis is $\mathrm{L}\neq\mathrm{NL}$. Moreover, we use our hypothesis as a plausible basis to lead to the insolvability of various NL search problems as well as the nonapproximability of NL optimization problems. For our investigation, since standard logarithmic-space reductions may no longer preserve polynomial-time sub-linear-space complexity, we need to introduce a new, practical notion of reduction. It turns out that, parameterized with the number of variables, $\overline{\mathrm{2SAT}_3}$ is complete for a syntactically restricted version of NL, called Syntactic NL$_{\omega}$, under such short reductions. This fact supports the legitimacy of our working hypothesis.

Unambiguous automata are nondeterministic automata in which every word has at most one accepting run. In this paper we give a polynomial-time algorithm for model checking discrete-time Markov chains against $\omega$-regular specifications represented as unambiguous automata. We furthermore show that the complexity of this model checking problem lies in NC: the subclass of P comprising those problems solvable in poly-logarithmic parallel time. These complexity bounds match the known bounds for model checking Markov chains against specifications given as deterministic automata, notwithstanding the fact that unambiguous automata can be exponentially more succinct than deterministic automata. We report on an implementation of our procedure, including an experiment in which the implementation is used to model check LTL formulas on Markov chains.