ABSTRACT Introduction Glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype (IDHwt), remains an incurable disease despite considerable research effort. The current standard of care since 2005 comprises maximal safe resection followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide; more recently, the addition of tumor treating fields was approved in the newly diagnosed and recurrent disease settings. Areas Covered Searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov provided a foundation for this review. We first describe early research including carmustine wafers, brachytherapy, anti-angiogenesis, and immune checkpoint inhibition for glioblastoma. Next, we discuss challenges precluding the translation of preclinical successes. This is followed by a description of promising treatments such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy as well as the recent qualified successes of cancer vaccinations. Non-immunotherapy trials are also highlighted, and ongoing or pending phase 2 and 3 clinical trials are codified in study tables. Expert Opinion Unfortunately, hundreds of trials, including of agents effective in systemic malignancy, have not drastically changed management of glioblastoma. This may reflect unique resistance mechanisms and highlights a need for multimodality treatments beyond surgery, radiation, and conventional chemotherapy. Novel techniques, such as those in the emerging field of cancer neuroscience, may help uncover tolerable and effective regimens for this lethal malignancy.

ABSTRACT Introduction Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Lowering LDL-cholesterol, by lifestyle modification or therapeutically, reduces the risk of ASCVD. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), a protein which binds to the LDL-receptor and induces degradation, is a clinically validated target to lower LDL-cholesterol. Injectable PCSK9 inhibitor therapies have demonstrated substantial reductions in LDL-cholesterol with associated decreased risk of ASCVD events. Areas covered MK-0616 is an orally bioavailable, renally excreted, macrocyclic peptide inhibitor of PCSK9. The article provides an understanding of the chemistry and development, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of MK-0616 and insight into its clinical efficacy and safety. In clinical trials, MK-0616 produced dose-dependent reductions in LDL-cholesterol, non-HDL-cholesterol, and apolipoprotein (apo) B levels. Furthermore, MK-0616 modestly lowered lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)]. Expert opinion MK-0616 is a potent, oral macrocyclic peptide inhibitor of PCSK9 that is not only able to reduce LDL-cholesterol, non-HDL-cholesterol, and apoB, but can also lower Lp(a). Safety and tolerability studies reported to date are promising. MK-0616 may offer advantages over injectable anti-PCSK9 therapies in terms of ease of dosing, patient preference and cost. The results from phase III trials of MK-0616 on cardiovascular outcomes are awaited with interest.

ABSTRACT Introduction NF1 is a tumor suppressor gene encoding neurofibromin, an inhibitor of the RAS/MAPK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathways. NF1 germline pathogenic variants cause the tumor predisposition syndrome neurofibromatosis type 1. Targeted therapies (MEK inhibitors) have been approved for benign nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis type 1 patients. NF1 somatic alterations are present in ~5% of all human sporadic cancers. In melanomas, acute myeloid leukemias and lung adenocarcinomas, the NF1 somatic alteration frequency is higher (~15%). However, to date, the therapeutic impact of NF1 somatic alterations is poorly investigated. Areas covered This review presents a comprehensive overview of targeted therapies and immunotherapies currently developed and evaluated in vitro and in vivo for NF1-altered cancer treatment. A PubMed database literature review was performed to select relevant original articles. Active clinical trials were researched in ClinicalTrials.gov database in August 2022. TCGA and HGMD® databases were consulted. Expert opinion This review highlights the need to better understand the molecular mechanisms of NF1-altered tumors and the development of innovative strategies to effectively target NF1-loss in human cancers. One of the current major challenges in cancer management is the targeting of tumor suppressor genes such as NF1 gene. Currently, most studies are focusing on inhibitors of the RAS/MAPK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathways and immunotherapies

ABSTRACT Introduction JAK inhibitors (JAKis), used in the treatment of myelofibrosis, have entered standard treatment, providing significant improvements in spleen size and symptom burden. Although splenomegaly provides a reduction and some improvement in cytopenia, there is still a way to go. Novel JAKis are being investigated to overcome barriers to treatment access, such as therapeutic challenges, intolerance, and unresponsiveness. Areas covered This review includes the current status of JAKi treatment for myelofibrosis, mainly focusing on investigational JAKis; jaktinib, lestaurtinib, itacitinib, gandotinib, BMS-911543, ilginatinib, TQ05105, and flonoltinib maleate. MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov were screened to identify all completed or active studies on this topic. The outcomes of the preclinical studies and clinical trials are presented and discussed for each drug. Expert opinion In patients with myelofibrosis, momelotinib was effective in treating anemia, whereas jaktinib was effective in both anemia and Total Symptom Score (TSS). More phase 3 studies are needed to provide more precise evidence. The increasing variety of JAKis will allow for more personalized treatment options for myelofibrosis in the future. The potential impact on disease progression, molecular responses, and the duration of this response will become important parameters for future evaluations of these drugs.

ABSTRACT Introduction Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) are heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by clonal proliferation of one of more of the hematopoietic stem cell lineages. Clinical manifestations result from uncontrolled myeloproliferation, extramedullary hematopoiesis with splenomegaly and excessive inflammatory cytokine production. Currently available therapy improves hematologic parameters and symptoms but don’t adequately address the underlying neoplastic biology. Bomedemstat has thus far demonstrated clinical efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of MPNs with recent evidence of impacting the malignant stem cell population. Areas covered This reviews summarizes the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, safety and efficacy of bomedemstat in MPN with specific emphasis on essential thrombocythemia (ET) and myelofibrosis (MF). Expert opinion In patients with MPNs bomedemstat appears effective and well tolerated. The signs and symptoms of these disease are managed as A reduction in the frequency of mutant cells was demonstrated in patients with ET and MF. Ongoing and planned studies of bomedemstat in MPN will establish the position of bomedemstat in MPNs and may help to redefine treatment endpoints of MPNs in the future.

ABSTRACT Introduction : Hearing loss has a high prevalence, with aging, noise exposure, ototoxic drug therapies, and genetic mutations being some of the leading causes of hearing loss. Health conditions such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes are associated with hearing loss, perhaps due to shared vascular pathology in the ear and in other tissues. Areas Covered : Issues in the design of preclinical research preclude the ability to make comparisons regarding the relative efficacy of different drugs of interest for possible hearing loss prevention or hearing restoration. This has not slowed the advancement of candidate therapeutics into human clinical testing. There is a robust pipeline with drugs that have different mechanisms of action providing diverse candidate therapies and opportunities for combination therapies to be considered. Expert Opinion : Much of the preclinical research literature lacks standard study design elements such as dose response testing, and lack of standardization of test protocols significantly limits conclusions regarding relative efficacy. Nonetheless, the many positive results to date have supported translation of preclinical efforts into clinical trials assessing potential human benefits. Approval of the first hearing loss prevention therapeutic is a major success, providing a pathway for other drugs to follow.

ABSTRACT Introduction Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis that is present in approximately 25% of psoriasis patients. Currently, several targeted therapies are available to manage PsA; however, many patients fail these therapies. Several new therapeutic options, with differing mechanisms of action, are currently being evaluated. Areas covered This article reviews available results from phase I to phase III trials of several investigational monoclonal antibodies that the FDA has not yet approved for PsA. The proposed mechanisms of the new therapeutic agents and their relevance to the pathogenesis of PsA will be discussed. The investigational agents’ efficacy and safety will be summarized, and their potential clinical applications for managing PsA will be contemplated. Expert opinion Due to recent advances in understanding psoriatic arthritis, therapeutic agents are increasingly focused on inhibiting interleukin-17 and interleukin-23 pathways. Various strategies have been used to inhibit these cytokines, demonstrating favorable efficacy and acceptable safety profile.

ABSTRACT Introduction Excessive activity of neutrophil elastase (NE), the main enzyme present in azurophil granules in the neutrophil cytoplasm, may cause tissue injury and remodeling in various lung diseases, including acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in which it is crucial to the immune response and inflammatory process. Consequently, NE is a possible target for therapeutic intervention in ALI/ARDS. Areas covered The protective effects of several NE inhibitors in attenuating ALI/ARDS in several models of lung injury are described. Some of these NE inhibitors are currently in clinical development, but only sivelestat has been evaluated as a treatment for ALI/ARDS. Expert opinion Preclinical research has produced encouraging information about using NE inhibitors. Nevertheless, only sivelestat has been approved for this clinical indication, and only in Japan and South Korea because of the conflicting results of clinical trials and likely also because of the potential adverse events. Identifying subsets of patients with ARDS most likely to benefit from NE inhibitor treatment, such as the hyperinflammatory phenotype, and using a more advanced generation of NE inhibitors than sivelestat could enable better clinical results than those obtained with elastase inhibitors.

ABSTRACT Introduction Pharmacological strategies might influence bone healing in terms of time to union or quality of mature bone. This expert opinion discussed the current level I evidence on the experimental pharmacological agents used to favor bone fracture healing. Areas covered This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the 2020 PRISMA statement. In April 2023, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase. All the randomized clinical trials investigating pharmacological agents for bone fracture healing were accessed. No time constraint was set for the search. The search was restricted to RCTs. No additional filters were used in the database search. Data from 19 RCTs (4067 patients) were collected. 78% (3160 of 4067) were women. The mean length of the follow-up was 9.3 months (range, 1–26 months). The mean age of the patients was 64.4 years (range, 8–84 years). Expert opinion Calcitonin could favor bone fracture healing. Bisphosphonates (alendronate, zoledronate, clodronate), monoclonal antibodies (denosumab, romosozumab), statins, vitamin D and calcium supplementation, strontium ranelate, and ibuprofen did not influence bony healing. Concerning the effect of parathormone, current level I evidence is controversial, and additional studies are required. Level of evidence Level I, systematic review of RCTs.