1,044 publications found
Sort by
Caregiver views on father-child contact in prison during the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for the use of video visits

ABSTRACT It is generally understood that visits to see incarcerated family members are good for children, families and those in prison. Much research has focused on the impact of prison visits on children and incarcerated mothers, ‘parents’ as a generic group or barriers to contact, while less attention has been paid to the effect of prison visits on incarcerated fathers. When COVID-19 spread across the globe in early 2020, prisons restricted in-person visits. In Australia, alternative forms of communication between prisoners and their families were utilised, including phone calls and video visits. Drawing on data from an online survey of caregivers of children with a family member in prison (n = 84), this paper specifically focuses on a sub-sample, reporting on imprisoned fathers (n = 70), describing and evaluating experiences with video visits. Most respondents reported that the father was not coping well with the lack of face-to-face contact, and almost two-thirds of respondents reported problems with keeping in contact after in-person visits were suspended. However, a small cohort of fathers were found to be coping well. These findings are explored, highlighting barriers to technology-facilitated visits, and point to a range of issues that need to be addressed for such visits to be beneficial.

Open Access
Relevant
The profile of people entering the ‘EQUIPS’ offender treatment programs in New South Wales’

ABSTRACT New South Wales has the largest population of incarcerated people in Australia, with increasing levels of community supervision. Corrective Services NSW offers eligible people the EQUIPS suite of offender treatment programs, which follow the Risk-Need-Responsivity model of offender rehabilitation. Referrals to the programs are also targeted to meet the specific reoffending needs of individuals, including EQUIPS Foundation, Aggression, Addiction and Domestic Abuse. This study examined the profile of people targeted for treatment in NSW by examining demographic, sentencing and criminogenic characteristics within a cohort of 18,963 individuals allocated to attend EQUIPS programs in custody and in the community between 2015 and 2018. Most individuals allocated to EQUIPS programs (80%) had a history of criminal justice system involvement, were male, with low education and most often from major cities or inner regional areas. Around a third were Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander. Less than half of those referred to EQUIPS participated in at least one treatment session and only one quarter completed the course of treatment. Recommendations for improved program delivery include: 1) more timely risk assessment and allocation to programs during individual’s sentences; and 2) enhancing equitable allocation between custodial and community settings based on individual risk and the types of programs available.

Open Access
Relevant
Sentencing and the over-representation of people with cognitive disability in the Australian criminal justice system

ABSTRACT People with Cognitive Disability (PWCD) are over-represented in Australian and International Criminal Justice Systems (CJS). Research has focused on the disadvantages experienced by PWCD which bring them into earlier and more continuous contact with the CJS than the general population. There has been little empirical analysis of how sentencing might contribute to over-representation. This article reports on a project which investigated: (1) the characteristics of PWCD who appeared before Queensland courts to be sentenced; and (2) the factors that judges considered during the sentencing of PWCD. An inductive thematic analysis of 34 sentencing remarks transcripts from Queensland’s Supreme and District Courts provided a descriptive overview to address the first component. Themes addressing the second component included: difficulties and disadvantages; capabilities; and the subjectivities of defendants. Interpreted using critical sociological perspectives on punishment, these themes demonstrated how judges navigated a tension between responding to defendants’ needs and protecting the community from a ‘dangerous other’. The community was often prioritised, contributing to the enmeshment of PWCD in the CJS. This adds to over-representation and raises the dilemma of how to respond to community safety concerns while meeting the potentially complex needs of PWCD without drawing them more deeply into the CJS.

Open Access
Relevant