Program translation aims to translate one kind of programming language to another, e.g., from Python to Java. Due to the inefficiency of translation rules construction with pure human effort (software engineer) and the low quality of machine translation results with pure machine effort, it is suggested to implement program translation in a human–machine cooperative way. However, existing human–machine program translation methods fail to utilize the human’s ability effectively, which require human to post-edit the results (i.e., statically modified directly on the model generated code). To solve this problem, we propose HMPT (Human-Machine Program Translation), a novel method that achieves program translation based on human–machine cooperation. It can (1) reduce the human effort by introducing a prefix-based interactive protocol that feeds the human’s edit into the model as the prefix and regenerates better output code, and (2) reduce the interactive response time resulted by excessive program length in the regeneration process from two aspects: avoiding duplicate prefix generation with cache attention information, as well as reducing invalid suffix generation by splicing the suffix of the results. The experiments are conducted on two real datasets. Results show compared to the baselines, our method reduces the human effort up to 73.5% at the token level and reduces the response time up to 76.1%.

Requirements elicitation is a stakeholder-centered approach; therefore, natural language remains an effective way of documenting and validating requirements. As the scope of the software domain grows, software analysts process a higher number of requirements documents, generating delays and errors while characterizing the software domain. Natural language processing is key in such a process, allowing software analysts for speeding up the requirements elicitation process and mitigating the impact of the ambiguity and misinterpretations coming from natural-language-based requirements documents. However, natural-language-processing-based proposals for requirements elicitation are mainly focused on specific domains and still fail for understanding several requirements writing styles. In this paper, we present QUARE, a question-answering model for requirements elicitation. The QUARE model comprises a meta-ontology for requirements elicitation, easing the generation of requirements-elicitation-related questions and the initial structuration of any software domain. In addition, the QUARE model includes a named entity recognition and relation extraction system focused on requirements elicitation, allowing software analysts for processing several requirements writing styles. Although software analysts address a software domain at a time, they use the same kind of questions for identifying and characterizing requirements abstractions such as actors, concepts, and actions from a software domain. Such a process may be framed into the QUARE model workflow. We validate our proposal by using an experimental process including real-world requirements documents coming from several software domains and requirements writing styles. The QUARE model is a novel proposal aimed at supporting software analysts in the requirements elicitation process.