Co-design of research and services alongside end users is increasingly required by funding bodies and governments. To enable a meaningful inclusion of people with communication disability, planning and modification are required, as standard co-design procedures involve extensive spoken and written language. Experience-based co-design (EBCD) is one co-design approach that is gaining popularity; however, there are few detailed reports to date on adapting EBCD for communication disability. This article outlines our modifications of EBCD to co-design a technology-enabled self-management platform (Communication Connect) for people living with poststroke aphasia and cognitive-communication disability from traumatic brain injury. Participants included individuals with communication disabilities (n = 8), care partners (n = 3), and health professionals (n = 20) across three Australian states. Data collection involved video-recorded interviews, focus groups, and structured prioritization workshops. This study describes the first four stages of EBCD (project setup, two experience-gathering stages, and identifying priorities). This article presents a detailed account of the practical decisions and modifications made throughout the EBCD process. Key adaptations are outlined, including the use of text-based video editing to efficiently create touchpoint films, nonlinear presentation of challenges to facilitate engagement, and visual aids to support prioritization and ranking. These modifications supported the meaningful participation of co-designers, including people with communication disability. This method article contributes to the growing knowledge on adapting EBCD for communication disability, which may be of use to future EBCD projects and for improving the meaningful inclusion of people with communication disability in co-design research.

[2025-11-05: This article is the corrected version of an article that appeared in vol. 7 no. 2 of this journal; see https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v7i2.10170 for the retraction notice. A minor correction has also been made in this document to the spelling of the authors' names.] Construction projects are most commonly procured in Australia by means of a traditional design–tender–build model, whereby design is largely completed then contractors submit tenders in a competitive environment. Construction contractors must consider risks within their tenders. This paper reports the research findings into pricing for risk in competitive tenders by construction contractors. The research is based on structured interviews with 10 contracting personnel; supplemented by 23 responses of construction personnel from an online survey. Two common methods to price for risk are a trade-by-trade basis or an overall percentage or lump sum addition to the base estimate. Experience and intuition plays a significant role in pricing for risk in tenders and the number and type of people involved varies with project size, with greater involvement as project size increases. The most significant risks priced in tenders were: availability of resources; design or documentation errors; incomplete design; buildability issues; and inclement weather. The most significant project factors considered by contractors when pricing for risk in tenders are: value of liquidated damages; type of contract/procurement; completeness of documentation; project complexity; and current workload. These risks and project factors are primarily those over which the contractor has limited or no control.

This article has been retracted. Retraction notice: https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v7i2.10170 Original abstract: Construction projects are most commonly procured in Australia by means of a traditional design-tender-build model, whereby design is largely completed then contractors submit tenders in a competitive environment. Construction contractors must consider risks within their tenders. This paper reports the research findings into pricing for risk in competitive tenders by construction contractors. The research is based on structured interviews with 10 contracting personnel; supplemented by 23 responses of construction personnel from an online survey. Two common methods to price for risk are a trade-by-trade basis or an overall percentage or lump sum addition to the base estimate. Experience and intuition plays a significant role in pricing for risk in tenders and the number and type of people involved varies with project size, with greater involvement as project size increases. The most significant risks priced in tenders were: availability of resources; design or documentation errors; incomplete design; buildability issues; and inclement weather. The most significant project factors considered by contractors when pricing for risk in tenders are: value of liquidated damages; type of contract/procurement; completeness of documentation; project complexity; and. current workload. These risks and project factors are primarily those over which the contractor has limited or no control.

While cohorts of Gen Z have flocked to TikTok, some governments are fighting to have it banned. But where has it come from and what has enabled its incredible market penetration across various countries and demographics? Crystal Abidin draws on original empirical work, news reports, and industry interviews to help readers understand TikTok as it has developed among youth cultures. Using anthropological methods to produce deep and insightful ethnographies about TikTok and its core users, TikTok and Youth Cultures will help readers develop a critical understanding of TikTok’s impact on society, its place in the social media landscape, and its cultural relevance around the world.