Sort by
Baya Project: Building Structural Shells in Wicker

The growing of natural fibres ‐ such as wicker ‐ is deeply virtuous: it helps to diversify the forest cover, itrequires limited inputs ??? even in water, little maintenance, and its CO2 emissions are minimal. Their uses in basketry date back to the Neolithic period, and even probably before. People around the world have employed braiding technics and basketry craft to design a large panel of objects, clothes, furniture, boats, etc. In the field of architecture and construction, we can identify natural fibre uses in numerous of vernacular shelters, but they are generally limited to non-structural filling elements. The scarcity of mechanical characterization of wicker material in the literature is underlying that, since now, these kinds of materials are not commonly used to a structural purpose. The aim of our research is to demonstrate the feasibility to design and build structural wicker braided shells for architectural purposes, and to provide designers with the necessary tools for this process. Thanks to wicker mechanical characterization and to experimental measurements, we developed a law which defines a relation between density and orientation of the stems and the fields of principal stresses on an idealized continuous surface: “each field of stress is related to an optimal braiding”. These data have supplied an algorithm, BAYA, making design and optimization of braided shells accessible and easy to use for architects and practitioners. Even if our research focused on wicker, it should be easily adaptable to other fibres and plants as, for instance ,rattan or reed. This innovative research is demonstrated by the realization of a full-scale public pavilion hanging from trees on the belvedere of the Butte du Chapeau Rouge park (Paris XIX), and a 12.8‐meter-long footbridge for the Utopies Constructives festival in Richelieu’s Park.

Relevant
From Bioinspiration to Biomimicry in Architecture: Opportunities and Challenges

The term “bioinspiration” defines a creative approach based on the observation of biological principles and transfer to design. Biomimicry is the recent approach, which describes a large field of scientific and technical activities dealing with an interdisciplinary cooperation between biology and other fields with the goal of solving practical problems addressing innovation or sustainable development. Architecture has been influenced by many aspects of natural and social sciences, among these, biology is currently blending into design activities. Bioinspiration has evolved and shifted architectural practices towards numerous innovative approaches through different bioarchitectural movements from the past until the present. However, there is a blur of biomimicry within bioinspiration in architecture between the direct copy of mere natural forms and the true understanding of biological principles, which is the pivot of sustainable development. The main challenge remains in the gap between the profound knowledge of biology, its related scientific fields and the creative process of architectural design, including cross-disciplinary collaboration between architects and biologists. This entry presents main bioarchitectural movements and how it leads to today’s biomimicry. It proposes to define biomimicry methodologies and how this approach applies to architectural design contexts through the study of existing case studies. The opportunities, challenges and the future outlook of the field will also be discussed.

Open Access
Relevant
Promoting Social Interaction through Participatory Architecture. Experimentation, Experience, Evaluation in a Social Housing Complex (Grand’Goule, Poitiers, 1974–2021)

Has the increase in social life and conviviality commonly imagined by the designers and decision-makers taken place? There are few systematic post-project evaluations of the methods and tools used to answer this question. Therefore, this article wishes to draw lessons from a housing experiment from the end of the 1970s, the Grand’Goule residence in Poitiers, the objective of which was to create a dense social life through design and means of participation. Some devices consisted in the creation of Surfaces d’Activités Partagées (SAPs, shared activities surfaces), which are common spaces where residents can intervene in both the interior design and the function of space itself. In this study, we analyze the Grand’Goule project, which has been displayed as a participative experiment, with the objective of creating a dense social life through original architectural and social devices. We use different sources (interviews of the inhabitants, project owners, and architects, alongside press articles and the architects’ archives) to dissect the practices in order to lead a retrospective analysis of the participative process, its successes and failures. We show that, as a very complex and fragile process, enabling the active participation of people in the design and use of a large-scale architectural project is far from obvious and suffers from several kinds of difficulties. We highlight the gap between initial intentions, final realizations and actual uses in the Grand’Goule project, and how it can inform every participative architectural project.

Open Access
Relevant
Architect Collectives and the Coproduction of Places in the “Grey Zones” of Urban Development Planning: The Educational Institution as a Mediation Framework

Recent research work carried out in France tends to show that calling on collectives of artists or architects to develop participatory approaches with inhabitants has become a common practice for public or private project owners. However, these interventions are still often limited to communication operations or come up against the inertia of political and professional cultures, which limits their scope. After briefly stating the circumstances that lead urban project owners in France to pay increasing attention to the skills of architectural “collectives”, this article focuses on the presentation of two experiments conducted by two of them. Articulating pedagogical and urban citizenship issues, these experiments were confronted with procedural and normative frameworks, some of which came from the world of urban production, others from the school institution. The aim of this article is to show that the coproduction of spaces that have a strong meaning for their users, but which are unthought of within strategic urban projects, can have a greater impact on the way in which the operational actors envisage their project. After summarizing the main highlights of these two experiments, this contribution discusses the lessons that can be drawn from them in terms of their implementation conditions and the extensions they may have had. From a methodological point of view, the interest of these two experiments lies in the fact that the two associations that were involved in them understood them as experiments from the outset. They thus implemented reflexive mechanisms involving researchers, of which this article is one of the concrete results.

Open Access
Relevant