BackgroundWith a growing number of elderly patients requiring elective and non-elective procedures, frailty-based preoperative risk stratification is an emerging tool in orthopedic surgery to minimize adverse postoperative outcomes. This paper sought to understand the current literature regarding preoperative Orthopedic Frailty Risk Stratification (OFRS) and describe the disparate frailty indices and their capabilities for discrimination in predicting adverse postoperative outcomes.MethodsA literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Cochrane, and Scopus for articles published during or prior to February 2024 assessing frailty following surgery for orthopedic pathologies. Qualitative variables including study characteristics and application of frailty were collected and synthesized. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed for pooled odds ratio (OR) and area under the curve (AUC) of frailty for mortality and complications. All methods were performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.ResultsOf the 81 included articles, over half (52%) addressed traumatic orthopedic pathologies with traumatic hip fractures being the most studied in the OFRS (25 studies). Less common categories included oncology, sports, and foot/ankle. Functional status and independence were the most common frailty domain (25, 96.2%) and component across scales (20, 76.9%), respectively. The 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) was the most common frailty index (28 publications). Meta-analysis demonstrated increasing frailty was an independent predictor of mortality (30-day OR: 2.89, 95% CI: 2.00–4.18; 1 year OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.48–2.22, p < 0.001), major complications (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.10–2.41, p = 0.02), and Clavien-Dindo IV complications (OR: 3.26, 95% CI: 2.18–4.87, p < 0.001). Frailty had good discriminatory accuracy for predicting mortality at 30-days (AUC: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.68–0.74, p < 0.001), 3-months (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65–0.83, p < 0.001), and 1-year (OR:0.74, 95% CI: 0.73–0.75, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe orthopedic surgery frailty literature is extremely heterogeneous, with disparate frailty scales implemented to measure varying outcomes across many orthopedic pathologies. Despite no consensus on exact scales or definitions, various frailty indices have predicted adverse outcomes.
Read full abstract