What tools are available for differential alternative splicing analysis and can identify alternative last exons?
Answer from top 10 papers
Several computational tools have been developed to analyze differential alternative splicing (DAS) from RNA-sequencing data, with capabilities that include the identification of alternative last exons. NBSplice is an R package designed for DAS analysis by estimating differences in relative expressions of gene transcripts, which could potentially identify alternative last exons (Seok et al., 2015). The ASDT algorithm is capable of identifying alternative splicing events, including novel ones from NGS data, which may encompass alternative last exons (Rouchka et al., 2020). PennDiff is another method that detects DAS at both exon and gene levels, offering the flexibility to potentially identify alternative last exons (Shen et al., 2012). Additionally, MATS provides a Bayesian statistical framework for hypothesis testing of DAS patterns, which could be used to identify alternative last exons (Merino & Fernández, 2020).
Interestingly, while these tools offer capabilities for DAS analysis, there may be challenges and limitations in their application. For instance, the performance of these tools can be influenced by the complexity of gene isoforms and the quality of RNA-seq data (Hu et al., 2018; Shen et al., 2012). Moreover, the accuracy of predictions and the need for extensive experimental validation are highlighted as areas for future improvement (Hu et al., 2018; Hu et al., 2019).
In summary, tools such as NBSplice (Seok et al., 2015), ASDT (Rouchka et al., 2020), PennDiff (Shen et al., 2012), and MATS (Merino & Fernández, 2020) are available for DAS analysis and have the potential to identify alternative last exons. However, the effectiveness of these tools can be contingent upon the complexity of the splicing events and the data quality, and they may require further validation to confirm their predictions.
Source Papers