What elements characterise residents interactions in masterplanned communities?

Answer from top 10 papers

Residents' interactions in master-planned communities (MPCs) are characterized by a variety of elements that influence social connectivity and community bonds. In Park Central, a master-planned development in Australia, residents' experiences were shaped by the development's ability to accommodate the changing lifestyle needs of a maturing population, with a focus on age-friendly principles (Buys et al., 2021). However, another study on an Australian MPC found that despite the developers' intentions, residents faced dissatisfaction due to inadequate social infrastructure and connectivity, highlighting a discrepancy between the envisioned and actualized community experience (El-Ekhteyar & Furlan, 2016).
In contrast, the Al-Ein compound in Doha exhibited a high sense of community, with robust ties and connections among residents, suggesting that the design and implementation of residential compounds can significantly influence social interactions (Tahir & Malek, 2018). Similarly, in South Australia and Victoria, the development of community and social capital in new MPCs was facilitated by factors such as familiarity, availability, and social bridges, although these were affected by the physical and social infrastructures present (Alidoust & Huang, 2022).
The literature review on MPCs and community health underscores the importance of physical features, social dimensions, and governance in shaping residents' social health (Jones & Parham, 2023). Meanwhile, the case study of an exurban MPC outside of Seattle revealed that while residents appreciated natural amenities, the development also presented challenges for the social environment of the broader exurban community (Tilt & Cerveny, 2013).
In gated communities, security elements such as access control and fencing were prioritized, which can impact the nature of resident interactions by emphasizing safety and exclusivity (Williams & Pocock, 2010). The study on senior housing communities (SHCs) indicated that a significant portion of older adults might experience decreased socialization and increased loneliness after moving to SHCs, suggesting that the transition to such communities can have complex effects on social interactions (Taylor et al., 2017). Lastly, the social networks of female residents in Bahrain's gated communities were influenced by factors in the built and social environments, offering insights into the social dynamics within these spaces (Salim, 2022).
In summary, residents' interactions in MPCs are influenced by a complex interplay of design principles, social infrastructure, community governance, and the specific demographic and cultural context of the community. While some MPCs foster strong community bonds and social capital, others may fall short of residents' expectations or lead to unintended social outcomes. These findings underscore the need for careful planning and consideration of social dynamics in the development of MPCs (Alidoust & Huang, 2022; Buys et al., 2021; El-Ekhteyar & Furlan, 2016; Jones & Parham, 2023; Salim, 2022; Tahir & Malek, 2018; Taylor et al., 2017; Tilt & Cerveny, 2013; Williams & Pocock, 2010).

Source Papers

The Lived Experience of Residents in an Emerging Master-Planned Community

Master-planned communities around the world are developed and purposefully planned to address housing sustainability and community connectivity; they often have a distinctive look, and appeal to a particular customer base desiring a strong, utopian-esque community. However, the lived experience of new residents joining master-planned communities has not been explored. This paper examines the lived experience of new residents within an emerging Australian master-planned estate, and reports on the first two stages of a longitudinal study focusing on the results of an online forum. This unique study presents real-life findings on a culturally diverse community. The findings reveal how the purposeful development of community identity in the early stages of the MPCommunity has not led to satisfactory levels of social infrastructure or social connectedness for the pioneering residents. The physical and social environment, as interpreted by residents against the developers’ imagined vision and marketing testimonies, has not been entirely satisfactory. Infrastructure issues—such as transport, and access to daily activities such as shopping, work, and school—were points of frustration and dissatisfaction. The findings provide insight into the challenges and opportunities for residents in a developing MPC, and further our understanding of the specific factors that inform us as to how social infrastructure can best encourage and support connection within existing and future MPC developments.

Open Access
PRIORITIZING THE PHYSICAL SECURITY ELEMENTS OF GATED COMMUNITY HOUSING USING THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

The concept of gated community housing is a feature of contemporary housing development. Housing developers promote this concept through an emphasis on security in gated housing. House owners today favour fenced-in residences, not only for their homes, but also for the entire housing development, including recreational areas and other facilities. The aim of this study is to prioritize the elements of physical security in a gated community housing development. The methodology employed a quantitative approach using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in ascertaining the weightage for each element deemed important in the planning of secure gated community housing, with focus on the elements of access, fencing, CCTV installation, lighting, guardhouse and landscape, which are the principal elements that serve to enforce security in the protected community. The results of this study showed that two principal elements, namely access to the property (entry/exit points) and protective fencing, were deemed the most important in providing security in gated community housing. Accordingly, these aspects should be accorded particular attention in the planning of gated communities in the future and be factored into the strategy to enhance security.Gated community housing and guarded neighbourhoods employing such a strategy would be quite effective in providing security to residents.

Open Access
Living in an Age-Friendly Community: Evidence from a Masterplanned Development in Southwest Sydney.

This paper is situated at the interface of a growing urban studies literature concerned with 'masterplanning' practices in urban planning and another, hitherto relatively discrete, body of research concerned with age-friendly cities and communities. The authors are interested in exploring a gap in aging in place literature around how neighbourhoods and residential settings developed with aging in place principles in mind are experienced and perceived by residents. To explore this research gap, the authors analyse qualitative (primarily interview and focus group) data collected in Park Central, a masterplanned development located in the Campbelltown suburb in the southwest region of the Sydney metropolitan area, Australia. This development was delivered in response to a need identified by the state's land and property development agency, Landcom, for more diverse and affordable medium-density housing in Campbelltown. In particular, a need was identified for housing developments that would be able to sustainably accommodate the changing lifestyle needs of a maturing population in the region. Drawing on our thematic analysis of our data, we discern three key themes in research participants' experiences of Park Central as a place for aging. These themes are elaborated via recourse to excerpts from our data and discussed with a view to informing how the conception, development and practice of further age-friendly communities is approached.

Open Access
Master-planned in exurbia: Examining the drivers and impacts of master-planned communities at the urban fringe

Smart growth strategies of infill and compact growth in existing suburban cities will most likely not be sufficient to absorb a new US household growth in the future. To meet housing demands and preferences, master-planned communities will continue to be built in outlying exurban areas. However, little is known about the impacts these communities may have on the surrounding physical, built and social environment in the exurban landscape. In this paper, we provide a review of the literature of what is known about the drivers behind the development of master-planned communities and the physical, built and social impacts of these developments on the surrounding exurban landscape. We then provide a case study of an exurban area outside of Seattle, Washington containing a large master-planned community. Through focus group interviews, we explore residential motivations to move to the area, and the benefits and challenges of living in an exurban landscape with a newly built master-planned community. Using qualitative data analyses, we find that residents are drawn to this exurban area for the abundance of natural amenities and outdoor recreation opportunities. However, the new master-planned community development presents many benefits and challenges for those living in the area; particularly the residential perceptions of impacts that the development has had on the surrounding natural and built environment. These real and perceived impacts of the master-planned community development has compounded and magnified the impacts to the social environment throughout the entire exurban community. Implications for planners and suggestions for future research are given.

RESIDENTS’ CHANGE IN SOCIALIZATION AND LONELINESS SINCE MOVING TO SENIOR HOUSING

It is frequently assumed older adults who move to senior housing communities (SHCs) will socialize more and be less lonely. The purpose of this study is to describe changes in residents’ frequency of socialization and loneliness since moving into senior housing, and to determine factors associated with these changes. Ninety-six older adults living in two SHCs completed cross-sectional surveys with items regarding changes in socialization and loneliness since moving into a SHC, age, education, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, years lived in the SHC, and distance to previous residence. Analyses for the current study include descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression models. Since moving into a SHC, twenty-five percent of residents had decreases in socializing with family, 20% had decreases in socializing with friends, 19% had decreases in level of companionship, 21% felt more left out, and 14% felt more isolated. Age, education, anxiety symptoms, and years living in the SHC were related to changes in socialization and loneliness in the multinomial logistic models. These analyses suggest a significant portion of older adults living in senior housing may socialize with friends and family less and feel lonelier after moving to senior housing. It is important to understand the reasons for decreasing social interactions and increasing loneliness after older residents move to senior housing, and how to intervene upon their behalf. Additional studies are needed to determine if these findings are consistent, and interventions should be developed to increase socializing and decrease loneliness among residents living in senior housing.

Open Access