What are the limits of quantum algorithms?
Answer from top 10 papers
Quantum algorithms are theoretically capable of solving certain problems much faster than classical algorithms, leveraging phenomena like superposition and entanglement (Molina et al., 2023; Motta & Rice, 2021; Russell & Stepney, 2014). However, there are fundamental limits to computation imposed by physical constraints, such as the speed at which a quantum computer can transition between states, which is constrained by the physical laws of motion and can be analyzed using the theory of Finsler metrics on Lie groups (Hadfield, 2018). Additionally, the current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era is characterized by quantum processors that lack quantum error correction and are limited in scalability, affecting the implementation of quantum algorithms (Riandari et al., 2021).
Theoretical limits provide an upper bound on the performance of algorithms, and practical limitations are also present due to the nascent state of quantum hardware and the need for software co-design to understand and advance capabilities (Emani et al., 2021). Moreover, while quantum computing offers significant advantages in certain fields, it is not yet near commercialization, and researchers must contend with challenges such as noise, error rates, and the need for error mitigation techniques (Riandari et al., 2021; Russell & Stepney, 2014). Theoretical models like Instantaneous Quantum Computing Algorithms (IQCA) propose to extend beyond current quantum limits, but these are still largely conceptual and require further development (Yang & Zhong, 2023).
In summary, while quantum algorithms hold promise for computational speedups, their limits are defined by both theoretical and practical constraints, including physical laws, the current state of quantum hardware, and the presence of noise in quantum systems. These limitations must be addressed through ongoing research and development to realize the full potential of quantum computing (Emani et al., 2021; Hadfield, 2018; Riandari et al., 2021; Yang & Zhong, 2023).
Source Papers