Abstract

The various different occurrences of -er in the morphology of German (e.g. in agentive and instrumental nouns, in comparatives, iteratives and intensifiers) are generally treated as being homonymous. In other words, just as in the case of full lexemes (e.g. Kiefer(knochen) 'jaw bone' vs. Kiefer(baum) 'fir tree'), it is assumed that different suffixes exist and that it is merely coincidental that they have an identical phonetic realisation. As far back as Germanic, the source of this identity-of-form has been taken to lie in reduction of the final syllable, whereby the process of phonological reduction has created identical suffixes from ones that were previously formally distinct. Our aim is to illustrate that in the case of nominal -er forms, there is good reason not to attribute identity of form simply to the 'blind application' of phonological rules. On the one hand, there are various aspects of the historical development which simply cannot be accounted for by recourse to phonological rules. This will be made clear through analysis of historical grammars and related literature. On the other hand, those categories that are formed with -er share common grammatico-semantic features. This too is often hinted at in the historical grammars and may be corroborated by an analysis of the grammatical features involved. Our findings thus motivate the following claim: The emergence of identical forms is not coincidental. Rather, alongside phonological rules, the emergence of identical forms is driven by more global principles of structure-formation, in particular by the principle of 'one form = one function'. Instead of different -er suffixes, there is in fact just one suffix which symbolises the iterative feature structure common to the -er marked categories.

Highlights

  • The various different occurrences of -er in the morphology of German are generally treated as being homonymous

  • Just as in the case of full lexemes (e.g. Kiefer(knochen) 'jaw bone' vs. Kiefer(baum) 'fir tree'), it is assumed that different suffixes exist and that it is merely coincidental that they have an identical phonetic realisation

  • As far back as Germanic, the source of this identity-of-form has been taken to lie in reduction of the final syllable, whereby the process of phonological reduction has created identical suffixes from ones that were previously formally distinct

Read more

Summary

Ausgangspunkte

Ausgehend von Jakobson (u.a. 1936/1971, 1941/1971, 1957/1971), Guillaume (u.a. 1929/1965, 1973) und Bühler (1934/1982) wird in der natürlichen Grammatik angenommen, dass grammatische Kategorien durch eine begrenzte Anzahl von (oppositionellen) Merkmalen konstituiert sind; analog zur Konstituierung der Sprachlaute. Während Leiss jedoch die gesamte Grammatik als Geltungsbereich der Null-Homonymie-These betrachtet, beziehen die Natürlichen Morphologen ihre Annahmen stets auf Verhältnisse innerhalb einzelner Teilkomponenten des Sprachsystems. Dies wird als weiteres Argument dafür betrachtet, dass Kategoriensymbolisierungen durch rein phonologische Entwicklungen und ohne Rücksicht auf die Inhaltsmerkmale der Kategorien formal zusammenfallen können. Nimmt man die Hinweise auf domänenübergreifende Beziehungen zwischen Kategorien hinzu und hebt die Beschränkung der Betrachtung von Synkretismen auf einzelne Teilkomponenten und Phänomenbereiche auf - die sich im Falle der Natürlichkeitstheorie wohl nicht zuletzt aus der Konzentration auf morphonologische Prozesse herleitet - so sollten m.E. auch die mit der Null-Homonymie-These verbundenen parallelen Erwartungen für das Gesamtsystem der Grammatik akzeptabel sein

Lautliche Entwicklung der nominalen -er-Bildungen
Lautgesetzlichkeit und die Null-Homonymie-These
Sichtung der sprachgeschichtlichen Rekonstruktionen
Komparation und Plural - Verwandtschaftsnamen und Nomina agentis
Nicht-er Suffixe im betrachteten Kategorienspektrum
Diskussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.