Abstract
The subject matter of this paper is the notion of spite (inat - relentless gridge and obstinacy in spite of consequences) and spiteful conduct as a special social preference. The goal is to examine the significance of spitefulness and its implications in analyzing the litigation and the choice between trial and settlement. In this paper, spitefulness is viewed from the perspective of different economic science disciplines (behavioral economics, experimental economics, neoclassical economic analysis of law) as well as psychology and evolutionary biology. Yet, primacy is given to the behavioral economics point of view, where spitefulness is defined as a willingness to inflict harm on others at one's own detriment and expense. In that context, the paper presents statistics on the number of civil proceedings in Serbia, together with comparative data on this matter, and discusses the implications of spiteful behavior on the number of civil proceedings. The paper sets out a conceptual framework for further empirical research on spite and spiteful conduct, and their importance in deciding whether to initiate litigation and/or choose between trial and settlement. It also examines the preferences of the Serbian citizens on this issue in order to address the following questions: do Serbian citizens prefer to litigate, and what is the role of spite in that context?
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
