Abstract

The present study examines Horacio Castellanos Moya's Insensatez in relation to recent criticism that has read the novel either as meta-testimonio or post-testimonio. This article challenges these positions through two strategies. First, the analysis relies on a theorem of ethics forwarded by Alain Badiou and Michel Foucault's notions of institutionality vis-à-vis biopolitics to establish that the narrative task at hand is a critique of structures of power extant in postwar Guatemala. This, in turn, permits a dialogue with Walter Mignolo's decolonial stance in regard to human rights, fueling a reading that suggests that the text is critical of measures of giving voice and remembering that conform to Western notions of rights and ethics.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.