Abstract

Abstract Background This study aimed to review qualitative psychological and non-psychologically based literature for work-life balance (WLB) inequalities within the veterinary and other allied professions. Methods The PECO framework includes qualitative studies published in any language but with an English translation involving adult workers in the veterinary or allied profession and outcomes around work-life balance. Seven relevant electronic databases EMBASE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Social Policy and Practice, HMIC Health Management Information Consortium, and Global Health, were used. The retrieved hits were exported to Endnote Desktop (Version 7.7.1) for sorting and management. Results Of the 3610 hits, 31 studies were eligible for narrative synthesis. The studies were published from 1980-2017 and came from 15 countries. 9(29%) of the 31 studies were from the USA. 22 of the 31 studies (71%) focused on a mix of professions. Data were collected in six different ways, with the most common being interviews (17 (54.8%) of 31 studies). Twenty-three questions were used to assess WLB. The most common ones focused on women becoming mothers, maternity leave, and return to work (five (16.1%) of 31 articles). Secondly were attitudes of ethnic minorities concerning education, employment, role-family conflict, etc., and family commitments (three (9.7%) of the 31 papers). Findings came under 74 different topics. Nineteen (25.7%) of the 74 topics occurred more than four times and were allocated under the appropriate sub-theme. The nine sub-themes include pregnancy, breastfeeding, motherhood, job/life satisfaction, age/gender/ethnic inequalities, return to work (RTW), health and lifestyle, dual-earning couples/family, workplace support, and work-family/family-work conflicts. Conclusions The review suggests that women, ethnic minorities, older staff, and those with health concerns are negatively impacted by inequalities around WLB in veterinary and allied professions. Key messages The findings from the review were used to support the development of psychological measures of work-life balance and gender differences. The results were used in online questionnaires/surveys for future participants within the veterinary profession in addressing inequalities.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.