Abstract

BackgroundIncreasing cervical screening coverage by reaching inadequately screened groups is essential for improving the effectiveness of cervical screening programs. Offering HPV self-sampling to women who are never or under-screened can improve screening participation, however participation varies widely between settings. Information on women’s experience with self-sampling and preferences for future self-sampling screening is essential for programs to optimize participation.MethodsThe survey was conducted as part of a larger trial (“iPap”) investigating the effect of HPV self-sampling on participation of never and under-screened women in Victoria, Australia. Questionnaires were mailed to a) most women who participated in the self-sampling to document their experience with and preference for self-sampling in future, and b) a sample of the women who did not participate asking reasons for non-participation and suggestions for enabling participation. Reasons for not having a previous Pap test were also explored.ResultsAbout half the women who collected a self sample for the iPap trial returned the subsequent questionnaire (746/1521). Common reasons for not having cervical screening were that having Pap test performed by a doctor was embarrassing (18 %), not having the time (14 %), or that a Pap test was painful and uncomfortable (11 %). Most (94 %) found the home-based self-sampling less embarrassing, less uncomfortable (90 %) and more convenient (98 %) compared with their last Pap test experience (if they had one); however, many were unsure about the test accuracy (57 %). Women who self-sampled thought the instructions were clear (98 %), it was easy to use the swab (95 %), and were generally confident that they did the test correctly (81 %). Most preferred to take the self-sample at home in the future (88 %) because it was simple and did not require a doctor’s appointment. Few women (126/1946, 7 %) who did not return a self-sample in the iPap trial returned the questionnaire. Their main reason for not screening was having had a hysterectomy.ConclusionsHome-based self-sampling can overcome emotional and practical barriers to Pap test and increase participation in cervical screening despite some women’s concerns about test accuracy. Mailing to eligible women and assuring women about test accuracy could further optimize participation in screening.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1804-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Increasing cervical screening coverage by reaching inadequately screened groups is essential for improving the effectiveness of cervical screening programs

  • It has been shown that human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as a primary screening test is more sensitive than a Pap test and provides better protection against cervical cancer [4]

  • This paper reports on a survey of never- and underscreened women who were randomised in a trial of selfsampling in Victoria, Australia, to document their experience with home-based HPV self-sampling and their views about self-sampling for cervical screening in future

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Increasing cervical screening coverage by reaching inadequately screened groups is essential for improving the effectiveness of cervical screening programs. Increasing coverage by reaching women who are not screened or under-screened is essential for improving the effectiveness of cervical screening programs [1]. This is because most cancers in an organised screening program are diagnosed in women who have never been screened or are lapsed screeners [2]. It has been shown that human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as a primary screening test is more sensitive than a Pap test and provides better protection against cervical cancer [4]. Primary HPV testing allows for self-sampling; a self-collected sample has been shown to have similar sensitivity (for underlying high grade cervical disease) to that of a practitioner-collected sample when a validated PCR based test is used [5]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.