Abstract
The phenomena-logical description of the constitution of meaningfulness and evidence often is presented (e.g., by the Husserl of the Cartesian Meditations and the Crisis) in terms of a metaphorical vocabulary of fields, horizons, streams, flows, etc. Though other phenomenological themes have been recognized in some of Wittgenstein's writings, his use of these field and stream metaphors in describing his family resemblances or private language positions has generally received very little attention. Perhaps the reason for this stems from a healthy caution about reading too much into a possible Husserl-Wittgenstein connection. Such an attitude, however, is overly cautious in the case of the relationship of Wittgenstein to the psychological writings of William James.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
