Abstract

Abstract The essay explores how two women filmmakers, each deploying her unique vision through the perspective of a female protagonist, stage a transformative encounter with the act of bearing witness to genocide. The Diary of Diana B. (Dnevnik Diane Budisavljević, 2019, Croatia) directed by Dana Budisavljević, and Quo Vadis, Aida? (2020, Bosnia-Herzegovina), directed by Jasmila Žbanić, both compel us to bear witness to mass atrocities while avoiding the pitfalls of turning suffering into a spectacle, and by sidestepping the predictable cinematic conventions of redemption and closure, both formally and narratively. In my analysis of the films as anti-spectacles through the framework of Trinh T. Minh-ha’s ‘speaking nearby’, I argue for the concept of ‘women’s world cinema’, a kind of cinema that is made by women, speaks to women’s experiences, and/or addresses the spectator as female while also speaking nearby instead of about its subjects in ways that eschew conventional spectatorial alignments and co-optations of traumatic experience.

Highlights

  • How women’s cinema can avoid conventional narratives and visual trappings of redemption and closure when addressing mass death is one of the central considerations of this essay, in which I analyze the approach of speaking nearby inexplicable trauma through a female perspective

  • In writing about trauma’s modes ofexpressability, Lauren Berlant poses a probing question: “When scenes of post-traumatic ineloquence morph into modes of transformative-style rhetoric, does the eloquent form distract from, become a mask for, or intensify the unreachable or inarticulable thought that wants to change the norms of negation?” (2001: 41)

  • There is, no simple or unifying answer to this question, when it comes to mass atrocities such as genocide, a crime against humanity, that is at the center of the two films I discuss in some detail here

Read more

Summary

Introduction

How women’s cinema can avoid conventional narratives and visual trappings of redemption and closure when addressing mass death is one of the central considerations of this essay, in which I analyze the approach of speaking nearby inexplicable trauma through a female perspective.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.