Abstract
The agricultural extension service in Sri Lanka is generally considered as supply driven, and limitedly focused on farmers' aspirations and needs. The state services are also said to be inefficient and operating at a high cost. From the farmers' point of view it is an incomplete service provider. This has increased attention towards the potential for privatization of agricultural extension services. Therefore, this study was conducted with the objectives of analyzing the tea smallholders' willingness to pay (WTP) for a fee-based extension service and the factors affecting their WTP. A sample of 100 tea smallholders was randomly selected from four sub office areas under the Tea Small Holdings Development Authority, Galle. Primary data were collected through a pre-tested questionnaire. Open ended elicitation method was used to obtain the WTP and a probit regression model was used to analyze the factors affecting their WTP. Although 66% of the tea small holders have received extension services from the Tea Small Holdings Development Authority, only 42% of them have had services at the right time. A majority of the tea smallholders rely more on their own experience. Although 42% of the tea smallholders have indicated that they would like to have some other extension service, only 24% were willing to pay for such a service. The average WTP was Rs. 85.62 per month by a tea smallholder. According to the probit analysis, proportion of income had a significant positive influence and farming experience had a significant negative influence on the WTP. Based on the analysis it could be concluded that the tea small holders' in Galle district have a minimal interest towards a fee-based extension service and hence implementation of a private advisory service in the tea smallholding sector is not viable. DOI: 10.4038/sjae.v7i0.1824 <em>Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics</em>, Vol. 7, 2005 pp.68-84
Highlights
Producers must receive current information and technology for effective management of their production, marketing and financial decisions
Of the 66 tea smallholders (TSHs), 61 have received extension services through seminars organized by the Tea Small Holdings Development Authority (TSHDA)
Privatization of extension services is important in order to reduce the financial burden on the government
Summary
Producers must receive current information and technology for effective management of their production, marketing and financial decisions. Individual characteristics of producers impact on the demand for information services while confidence in the information services is a central determinant of the frequency at which a producer refers to the services. Such information services are used as an intermediate good in the production of an agricultural commodity and are referred to as extension services. Extension is often defined as a combination of a communication dimension and educational dimension, meaning transmission of technical information to farmers and assisting them in development of skills to make use of technical information (Second Perennial Crop Development Project, 1999). The agricultural extension service in Sri Lanka is generally considered as supply driven, limitedly focused on farmers’ aspirations and needs and institutionalized crop wise (Second Perennial Crop Development Project, 1999)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
