Abstract

Returnee-entrepreneurs, or nationals from developing countries who start new ventures at home after study or work abroad, appear ideally positioned to act as brokers between developed and developing economies. While this portrayal of returnees is plausible, we have reasons to expect that not all returnees who could become brokers actually do. Specifically, actors face a conflict between actions that help them to establish or maintain their category membership and actions that aim at brokerage. The costs of engaging in brokerage are particularly high for actors whose category membership is insecure. In this paper, using hand-collected qualitative and quantitative data on firms in Shanghai’s semiconductor-design industry, I illustrate this conflict by presenting evidence that for firms established by returnee-entrepreneurs whose identity as domestic firms is insecure, maintaining that identity can conflict with engaging in brokerage by seeking foreign investors. These results imply that institutional factors have an important effect on the ability of returnee-entrepreneurs to act as brokers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.