Abstract
According to the Solvency II directive, insurers can use internal models for solvency assessment, but regulators must approve these models. Sensitivity analysis is a crucial part of the approval process. However, the directive lacks clarity on the required sensitivity analysis. Various techniques exist in literature to assess the impact of model assumptions on output, each revealing different aspects of model behaviour. In this letter, we suggest a minimum standard for regulators to ensure model quality. We propose complementary sensitivity settings for internal model development, governance, and approval. Implementing these settings enhances the explainability of approved models and their reliability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.