Who puts the “support” in supportive housing? The relationship between housing staff support and resident experiences, and the potential moderating role of self‐determination

Impact of Permanent Supportive Housing on the Use of Acute Care Health Services by Homeless Adults

Serious Mental Illness in Post-Acute and Long-Term Care:Building Knowledge, Sharing Care

Cancer Risk Factors Among Adults with Serious Mental Illness

People diagnosed with serious mental illness (SMI) experience significant health disparities, including high rates of premature mortality. Supportive housing may serve as a critical service setting for addressing physical health, but comprehensive health-related services within these programs remain an exception. This study sought to identify barriers, and potential solutions, to addressing the physical health needs of people with SMI within supportive housing. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with multiple stakeholders(clients, peer specialists, non-peer staff, leadership) across three supportive housing agencies. There was general consensus regarding multiple barriers at the individual, organizational, policy/system, and community levels. Nevertheless, stakeholders also identified strategies in domains such as staffing, organizational culture, partnerships, communication, and infrastructure for addressing barriers. These findings can inform planning for implementation of health initiatives within supportive housing while also highlighting the need for broader community, systems, and policy change.Trial Registration Number: NCT02175641.

Overweight and obesity disproportionally impact people with serious mental illness (SMI). Healthy lifestyle interventions can improve the health of people with SMI but may need to be adapted for this population. The aims of this study were: to (1) examine the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the Peer-based Group Lifestyle Balance (PGLB) intervention and (2) describe intervention adaptations for people with SMI in supportive housing. Peer specialists and social workers co-facilitated 12 weekly PGLB sessions for 14 supportive housing clients. We conducted structured interviews and collected qualitative data through field notes and two focus groups. Frequencies and measures of central tendencies were used to describe participant characteristics and PGLB feasibility and acceptability measures. Qualitative data was analyzed using directed content analysis. Participants on average attended 8 of 12 sessions, and reported that services were satisfactory and helpful. Intervention adaptations, ongoing throughout the study, focused on adding peer-specialists as co-facilitators, increasing individualized support and developing strategies to address socioeconomic barriers impacting participants' ability to engage in healthy lifestyle changes. Study findings suggest that participants with SMI in supportive housing perceived PGLB as feasible and acceptable. Expanding the relevance and reach of peer-based healthy lifestyle interventions in community settings serving people with SMI requires careful adaptations to the socioeconomic realities of this population and the complexities of living with co-morbid health and mental health conditions.

Overall, the retention of people with serious mental illness (SMI) in supportive housing is high. However, some supportive housing settings report average stays of only 15 months, and others report declines in housing retention over time. Many studies report variables associated with supportive housing stability and tenure, but there are few extensive, focused investigations on the subject.Hence, a literature review was conducted to investigate factors associated with supportive housing stability and tenure among people with SMI. The review of the included 28papers revealsthatthe factors associated with supportive housing stability and tenure fell into two general categories of individual factors (including psychiatric factors and prior homelessness), and contextual factors (including program characteristics and sense of community and social support). In conclusion, further focus on contextual factors, as well as a potential reframing of individual factors as contextual, may be helpful in addressing issues related to supportive housing stability and tenure for people with SMI.

BackgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is a primary contributor to premature death among people with serious mental illness (SMI). This study examined the prevalence and correlates of the American Heart Association (AHA) metric of ideal cardiovascular health (ICVH) in racially and ethnically diverse people with serious mental illness living in supportive housing.MethodsOur study used baseline data from an NIMH-funded trial testing the effectiveness of a peer-led healthy lifestyle intervention, for overweight/obese participants with SMI in three supportive housing agencies. A total of 314 participants were enrolled in the trial and included in these analyses. Five ICVH metrics (BMI, smoking, diet, physical activity, and blood pressure [BP]) were measured and summed to create a composite ICVH score. Correlates were informed by findings from systematic literature reviews examining ICVH in the general population and studies examining correlates of CVD in people with SMI. Hierarchal regression analysis was used to examine the associations of sample correlates with the composite ICVH score.ResultsThe mean age of participants was 48.7 and 57.3% were male. The most common lifetime mental health diagnoses were depression (75.2%), schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (56.7%), and bipolar disorder (46.5%). Approximately 38.5% of participants reported lifetime substance abuse/dependence. The majority (62.7%) were taking an antipsychotic medication. Lifetime physical health diagnoses were high cholesterol (36.3%), diabetes (32.5%), cardiovascular disease (17.2%), and cancer (4.5%). Participants walked on average 318.4 meters during the six-minute walking test (6MWT), a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). The prevalence of smoking (64.7%) and obesity (64%) were high, while the prevalence of ideal physical activity (37.6%), healthy diet status (2.2%), and ideal BP (23.6%) were low. The mean ICVH composite score was 3.15 (range 0 – 8). After controlling for all covariates, women, racial/ethnic minorities, use of antipsychotic medications, lifetime cancer diagnosis, and poor CRF were significantly (p < .05) related to low ICVH scores.DiscussionIn our racially/ethnically diverse sample of people with SMI in supportive housing, the prevalence of ICVH was low. Our findings suggest that there are specific subgroups that may benefit from targeted screening and interventions to improve cardiovascular health. The association between CRF and ICVH scores highlights the importance of increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior. The AHA ICVH metric can be a useful tool for tracking and improving the cardiovascular health of people with SMI.

Factors Associated With Departure From Supported Independent Living Programs for Persons With Serious Mental Illness

Patients With Serious Mental Illness Need Better Primary Care Integration, Health Advocacy

Since the closure of large psychiatric institutions, various types of community-based supportive housing for people with serious mental illness (SMI) have been developed. There is currently limited knowledge about users' experiences of living in supportive housing. The aim of the present study was to describe user experiences of living in supportive housing for people with SMI. Twenty-nine people living in such facilities participated in open, qualitative interviews. Data were subjected to latent content analysis. Three main themes emerged from this analysis: (i) having a nest, which included the subthemes of a place to rest and having someone to attach to; (ii) being part of a group, with the subthemes of being brought together and a community spirit; and (iii) leading an oppressive life, including the subthemes of questioning one's identity, sense of inequality, and a life of gloom. It could be concluded that user experiences of living in supportive housing are complex and paradoxical. In order to provide supportive housing, staff need to recognize and work within social group processes, and perform continual and structural evaluations of users' social and emotional needs.

ABSTRACTBackground: Homeless persons with substance use disorders (SUD) have high disease risk, poor access to health care, and are frequent users of Medicaid and other social services. Low-demand supportive housing with no prerequisites for treatment or sobriety has been shown to improve housing stability and decrease public service use for chronically homeless persons with serious mental illness (SMI) and chronic medical conditions. The impact of low-demand housing on individuals with SUD but without co-occurring SMI has been little studied. This evaluation compares housing retention and use of crisis public services (jail, emergency department visits, hospitalization, and substance detoxification) between individuals treated and untreated for SUD before move-in to a low-demand supportive housing program in New York City. Methods: The authors used matched administrative records for individuals with SUD but no SMI placed in supportive housing during 2007–2012. Participants received SUD treatment (n = 1425; treated participants) or were not treated (n = 512; active users) at housing application. Propensity score–weighted regression analyses were used to best estimate the effect of SUD treatment on incarceration, public service utilization, and housing retention. Results: Persons not treated for SUD had a significantly longer tenure in supportive housing than treated participants. However, not treated tenants were more likely to be incarcerated. Opioid agonist therapy and older age decreased the risk of housing discharge, whereas detoxification and inpatient SUD treatment increased the risk of discharge. Conclusions: Persons with SUD can achieve residential stability in supportive housing that does not require SUD treatment before admission.

We examined demographic, health, and mental health correlates of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in racially and ethnically diverse people with serious mental illness (SMI)living in supportive housing. We used baseline data from 314 people with SMI enrolled in a randomizedeffectiveness trial of a peer-led healthy lifestyle intervention. Sedentary behavior and physical activity were measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. CRF was measured with the 6-min walking test (6MWT). Correlates were identified via ordinary least squares and logistic regressions. Participants were mostly male and racial/ethnic minorities. Thirty-four percent engaged in at least 150-min-per-week of at least moderate-intensity physical activity. On average, participants walked 316.8m in the 6MWT. Our models show that physical activity and CRF were not evenly distributed in racially and ethnically diverse people with SMI and are associated with multiple demographic, mental health, and health factors. Our findings suggest subgroups and factors that can be targeted to develop health interventions to improve the physical health of people with SMI.

This article begins with the history of the rise and fall of the state hospitals and subsequent criminalization of persons with serious mental illness (SMI). Currently, there is a belief among many that incarceration has not been as successful as hoped in reducing crime and drug use, both for those with and those without SMI. Moreover, overcrowding in correctional facilities has become a serious problem necessitating a solution. Consequently, persons with SMI in the criminal justice system are now being released in large numbers to the community and hopefully treated by public sector mental health. The issues to consider when releasing incarcerated persons with SMI into the community are as follows: diversion and mental health courts; the expectation that the mental health system will assume responsibility; providing asylum and sanctuary; the capabilities, limitations, and realistic treatment goals of community outpatient psychiatric treatment for offenders with SMI; the need for structure; the use of involuntary commitments, including assisted outpatient treatment, conservatorship and guardianship; liaison between treatment and criminal justice personnel; appropriately structured, monitored, and supportive housing; management of violence; and 24-hour structured in-patient care. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The use of blogs and vlogs by people with serious mental illness (SMI) and common mental illness (CMI) has attracted increasing academic interest due to the development of online illness narratives. This systematic review aims to explore the use of blogs and vlogs, identifying their narratives and characteristics, perceived benefits and adverse effects associated os their use. This would allow us to know the influence of this type of media on authors' personal recovery. Following PRISMA guidelines, an exhaustive search of four databases was conducted, using terms such as 'blog', 'vlog' and 'serious mental illness' among the most relevant. The selected articles were empirical studies, written in English, published in peer-reviewed journals from 2014 to 2024 and explored the use of blogs and vlogs by people with SMI and CMI. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Self-expression narratives on these platforms tend to be first-person and address issues such as stigma, barriers to treatment and self-management of symptoms. Key benefits include the creation of support networks, reduction of social isolation and individual empowerment, all of which are intrinsically related to personal recovery. However, risks were also identified, such as the possibility of employment discrimination and emotional vulnerability to negative comments. This review highlights the need for future research that explores cross-cultural experiences and provides a sound basis for the design of interventions that promote the positive use of blogs and vlogs in mental health recovery.

Identification of serious mental illness (SMI) among those entering jail is the first step in diversion or appropriate services in jail. Although best practices guidelines for identifying SMI exist, many jails do not employ these standards. Researchers describe identification of SMI in the "practice as usual" and compare/contrast the results with a validated screening instrument for 2,961 individuals across eight jails. Overall, 20% scored positive on the screening instrument, and staff identification yielded an additional 16%. While the instrument was consistent in identifying the proportion of persons with SMI across each county (16% to 22%), the proportion identified by jail staff varied greatly (3% to 33%). Moreover, referral to-and receipt of-subsequent services for the staff-identified individuals varied greatly, leading to recommendations for improved processes.