Abstract

While Alison Landsberg's argument for a politically progressive prosthetic memory made possible by modern media and global capital is theoretically provocative and politically appealing, it is ultimately unsustainable. What she describes as memory might better be called a combination of knowledge and empathy. And her account of the prosthetic quality of movies and experiential museums is equally applicable to more traditional verbal texts and, indeed, to symbol use per se. Nevertheless, Landsberg's book (Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture, Columbia University Press, 2004) presents a valuable new way of thinking about the problem of representing and responding to events one did not experience.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.