Abstract
This paper investigates the idea that undergraduate design courses are predicated on project work framed by a design studio educational setting. To answer the research question, we followed an empirical approach supported by a grounded theory methodology: (1) we gathered 31 publicly available undergraduate design courses programmes and descriptions, (2) we followed the procedures of classic grounded theory to code the data, categorise any clusters that emerged, and finally identified any patterns or insights that emerged from the data. The results of this study support the notion that the design project is still the preferred pedagogical tool for undergraduate design courses; furthermore, the design project is also clearly associated with the design studio educational format. Moreover, the key design education concepts that emerged from our analysis are also evidently interrelated; this finding suggests that an underlying coherent design education theory crosses national boundaries and is familiar to any design course. Finally, the prevalence of learning by doing pedagogy supported by project work within the design studio context suggests that undergraduate design education may not fit distant education formats.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.