Abstract
This paper analyzes daily wheat price volatility over an observation period of more than 140 years, using daily high and low prices of futures contracts traded at the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT), starting in 1877. We find that volatility differences between the identified regimes is much more important than volatility differences within the regimes, even when conditioning on state variables such as business cycles or inflation. Our findings suggest that the neglect of regimes can lead to a severe misinterpretation of the results when volatilities are correlated with exogenous variables. Further, historical volatility estimates derived from average price data, as is typically done in literature, are upward biased. The bias ranges between 0% and 22% across regimes. The magnitude potentially explains contradictory findings on volatility patterns in earlier studies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
