Abstract

Pursuant to art. 191 section 1 of the Act on Higher Education and Science, a person who has received positive reviews from at least two reviewers may be allowed to defend a doctoral dissertation. An in-depth analysis of this provision and practical experience from recent years of its validity indicate that this seemingly logical-looking regulation raises numerous doubts, problems and difficulties that arise at the stage of issuing a decision refusing admission to defense. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze it thoroughly and to try to indicate ways of proceeding in order to avoid procedural problems that entities authorized to award academic degrees often face nowadays. Finally, de lege ferenda conclusions will also be presented, which would help eliminate the difficulties that are currently emerging.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.