Abstract

BackgroundLarge amounts of sitting at work have been identified as an emerging occupational health risk, and findings from intervention trials have been reported. However, few such reports have examined participant-selected strategies and their relationships with behaviour change.MethodsThe Stand Up Victoria cluster-randomised controlled trial was a workplace-delivered intervention comprising organisational, environmental and individual level behaviour change strategies aimed at reducing sitting time in desk-based workers. Sit-stand workstations were provided, and participants (n = 134; intervention group only) were guided by health coaches to identify strategies for the ‘Stand Up’, ‘Sit Less’, and ‘Move More’ intervention targets, including how long they would stand using the workstation. Three-month workplace sitting and activity changes (activPAL3-assessed total sitting, prolonged sitting (i.e., sitting ≥30 min continuously) and purposeful walking) were evaluated in relation to the number (regression analysis) and types of strategies (decision-tree analysis).ResultsOver 80 different strategies were nominated by participants. Each additional strategy nominated for the ‘Stand Up’ intervention target (i.e. number of strategies) was associated with a reduction in prolonged sitting of 27.6 min/8-h workday (95% CI: -53.1, − 2.1, p = 0.034). Types of strategies were categorised into 13 distinct categories. Strategies that were task-based and phone-based were common across all three targets. The decision tree models did not select any specific strategy category as predicting changes in prolonged sitting (‘Stand Up’), however four strategy categories were identified as important for total sitting time (‘Sit Less’) and three strategy categories for purposeful walking (‘Moving More’). The uppermost nodes (foremost predictors) were nominating > 3 h/day of workstation standing (reducing total workplace sitting) and choosing a ‘Move More’ task-based strategy (purposeful walking).ConclusionsWorkers chose a wide range of strategies, with both strategy choice and strategy quantity appearing relevant to behavioural improvement. Findings support a tailored and pragmatic approach to encourage a change in sitting and activity in the workplace. Evaluating participant-selected strategies in the context of a successful intervention serves to highlight options that may prove feasible and effective in other desk-based workplace environments.Trial registrationThis trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials register (ACTRN12611000742976) on 15 July 2011,

Highlights

  • Large amounts of sitting at work have been identified as an emerging occupational health risk, and findings from intervention trials have been reported

  • In light of consistent evidence showing that high levels of sitting are detrimentally associated with numerous health outcomes and premature mortality [1, 2], addressing this ubiquitous behaviour is recognised as an important intervention target [3, 4]

  • For the ‘Stand Up’ intervention target, strategies were nominated by participants in 10 of the 13 categories

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large amounts of sitting at work have been identified as an emerging occupational health risk, and findings from intervention trials have been reported. Few such reports have examined participant-selected strategies and their relationships with behaviour change. A growing number of trials have evaluated interventions to reduce sitting time in the office workplace [5] In this context, interventions that utilise a multi-component approach (i.e. implementing behaviour change strategies across different levels of intervention such as individual and environmental change) to account for the multiple factors influencing sedentary behaviour [9], have typically been shown to be the most successful for reducing workplace sitting time in desk-based workers [5]. In the context of workplace interventions to reduce sitting time, detailed consideration of strategies selected by participants and their relationship to sitting and activity changes is needed to inform future intervention development and workplace policies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.