Abstract
A growing number of studies have revealed the dependency, particularly of poor people, on income from wild and uncultivated resources. Inclusion and analysis of environmental income are important in diagnosing the extent of poverty, for understanding its causes, and in identifying policies for its alleviation. The concept of environmental income is, however, poorly developed. Different studies use different measures, while underlying assumptions are often neglected or only partly revealed. In this paper, we analyze the concept of environmental income with respect to its sources, appropriate income measures, and ways of separating environmental income from non-environmental income. We argue that natural rent realized, through consumption or alienation, within the first link of a market chain provides a precise and logically consistent measure of environmental income under conditions of perfect competition. Because of frequent imperfections in rural markets, however, and because estimation of rent may be infeasible, a value added measure may sometimes have to be substituted. Regardless of which of the two concepts is chosen, explicit specification would represent a significant improvement in much of the current literature.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.