Abstract
The relationship between humans and the environment is becoming unsustainable. Technologies mediate this relationship. In turn, technology is a product of dense cultural phenomena, from research institutions to capitalism, from ethics to cosmology. This paper investigates the ‘cosmotechnics’ of technical interactions with the environment and explores the sources of these social, ethical and environmental problems. The disconnect between humans and nature is traced to the roots of Western culture, while alternative views have emerged within the West and through its awareness of other cultures.
 Technology in the West betrays a titanic urge to overcome nature. Since all technologies mesh with their immediate and global environment, invention arises from the interaction between assemblages of humans, machines and the environment. All contribute incrementally to new developments, which are not conscious projects fulfilling specific intentions, but evolving scenarios.
 Without any clear intentional drive determining technological developments—nor any clear distinction between intended and unintended consequences—the concept of intention has little probative value. Instead, we approach the ethical judgment of outcomes from the viewpoint of responsibility. The social milieu and its actors are to be held to account for the consequences, regardless of intentions.
 The paper identifies a malaise arising when the products of labour are split from an awareness of agency. This alienation opens up a misrecognition basic to unsustainable technologies. It operates at three discernible levels: technology split from culture; technology split from ethics and values; and theory split from technological practice. Solutions are sought through overcoming each of these gaps.
Highlights
Humans are experiencing a crisis in our relationship with the natural world
This paper inquires into the sources of our alienation from the environment, with the aim of preparing the ground for some tentative solutions
Confusions of responsibility can result from misrecognition of agency, such as when human agency is confused with that of gods or machines
Summary
Humans are experiencing a crisis in our relationship with the natural world. Our impact on all other living systems, through climate change, land clearing and use of chemicals and plastics is, frankly, apocalyptic. Leroy Little Bear has pointed out that in Blackfoot thinking, all beings are animate, including not just trees but rocks.[12] is every thing animate, but there can be communications between them and humans This is familiar from many Australian origin stories, where there was two way communication and even transmigration between the earthly and heavenly, the human and non-human, as we have seen in Ancient Greek stories.[13] A key difference between these relationships and those in the West is that the latter no longer include intercourse with gods, plants or geography
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
