Abstract
Alternative schools are no more, and often less effective in teaching academic skills than are traditional schools. Alternative schools do, however, teach a “hidden curriculum,” a set of norms nearly the inverse of those traditional schools teach. Using the work of Dreeben, On What Is Learned in School (1968), and contrasting his findings with those from a two-year study of two alternative high schools, it is argued that in place of the values of individualism and achievement, alternative schools teach group skills. Students do not learn to cope with the stress of evaluation and the risk of failure; instead they are encouraged to develop autonomy, self-direction, and emotional openness. In contrast to the universalistic, specific norms of traditional schooling, free schools stress diffuse, particularistic, intimate relations between teachers and students and within the student peer group. The paper concludes with an analysis of the social class implications of the norms which free schools teach.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.