Weyl Derivation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

Principles of uncertainty: What are they? Why do we need them?

The authors point out a logical fallacy in Robinson's analysis (ibid., vol.13, p.877, 1980) of a thought experiment purporting to show violation of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. The real problem concerning the interpretation of Heisenberg's principle is precisely stated.

It is established that special relativity and quantum mechanics are two very wide apart theories of measurements in modern physics in terms of determinism versus indeterminism. Modern physics accepts indeterminism against classical determinism. But it is remarkable that Einstein's special relativity in its present form alone contains the basic ingredients of quantum theory. Einstein's theory can give a simple theoretical proof of the Planck's quantum hypothesis and can explain the origin of mass out of zero rest mass of photon. This article at the first place shows how to proceed in this path from relativistic energy momentum relations and at the second place it shows the reason of energy and momentum indeterminacy from the framework of relativity. At the last phase the article puts a question on the sustainability of special relativity itself before oscillation of any kind. This paper deals with the matter to the extent special relativity containing quantum theory. Index Terms— Special relativity, simultaneity of events, Planck's quantum theory, energy momentum 4 vector, Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle, concept of mass, ensemble of photon. —————————— a —————————— 1 I NTRODUCTION t is a common belief that the jurisdiction of special relativi- ty and quantum theory are mutually exclusive. In 1900 Max Planck gave his famous quantum hypothesis of light together with the energy- frequency relation . Eh Q In 1905 Einstein gave special relativity. Both the regime went their own way and ultimately clashed each other with the arrival of Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle in 1926. Einstein con- ceded defeat to Bohr ultimately but still believed that quan- tum theory lacks something very serious. But modern physics points clearly to the triumph of Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle in every context. Nonetheless it is worthwhile to mention that the very genesis of quantum theory of light pre- scribed by Eh Q and the very essence of mass can be de- rived even in the frame work of special relativity. Even Ein- stein could get it using his own energy momentum relation. Planck's quantum relation of photon and the construction of mass from an ensemble of photons are indeed inbuilt in Ein- stein's theory. We can even reconcile Heisenberg's principle of indeterminacy with the framework built by Einstein.

Developments in Uncertainty-Based Information

We attempt to contribute some novel points of view to the "foundations of quantum mechanics", using mathematical tools from "quantum probability theory" (such as the theory of operator algebras). We first introduce an abstract algebraic framework for the formulation of mathematical models of physical systems that is general enough to encompass classical and quantum mechanical models. After a short discussion on the properties of classical systems (realism and determinism), we move on to the study of a general class of quantum-mechanical models of physical systems and explain what some of the key problems in a quantum theory of observations and measurements are. In the last part of our essay, we attempt to elucidate the roles played by entanglement between a system and its environment and of information loss in understanding "decoherence" and "dephasing", which are key mechanisms in a quantum theory of measurements and experiments. We also discuss the problem of "time in quantum mechanics" and sketch an answer to the question when an experiment can be considered to have been completed successfully.

The central problem in the quantum theory of measurement, how to describe the process of state reduction in terms of the quantum mechanical formalism, is solved on the basis of the relativity of quantal states, which implies that once the apparatus is detected in a well-defined state, the object state must reduce to a corresponding one. This is a process termed by Schrodinger disentanglement. Here, it is essential to observe that Renninger's negative result does constitute an actual measurement process. From this point of view, Heisenberg's interpretation of his microscope experiment and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen arguments are reinvestigated. Satisfactory discussions are given to various experimental situations, such as the Stern-Gerlach-type experiment, successive measurements, macroscopic measurements, and Schrodinger's cat. Finally it is proposed to regard a state vector in quantum mechanics as an irreducible physical construct, in Margenau's sense, that is not further analyzable both mathematically and conceptually.

Taking into account a wavelet transform associated with the quadratic‐phase Fourier transform, we obtain several types of uncertainty principles, as well as identify conditions that guarantee the unique solution for a class of integral equations (related with the previous mentioned transforms). Namely, we obtain a Heisenberg–Pauli–Weyl‐type uncertainty principle, a logarithmic‐type uncertainty principle, a local‐type uncertainty principle, an entropy‐based uncertainty principle, a Nazarov‐type uncertainty principle, an Amrein–Berthier–Benedicks‐type uncertainty principle, a Donoho–Stark‐type uncertainty principle, a Hardy‐type uncertainty principle, and a Beurling‐type uncertainty principle for such quadratic‐phase wavelet transform. For this, it is crucial to consider a convolution and its consequences in establishing an explicit relation with the quadratic‐phase Fourier transform.

An abstract derivation of the inequality related to heisenberg's uncertainty principle

It is shown that the claims of Home and Sengupta (1981) and of Singh (1981) to have discovered fallacies in the author's analysis of a proposed, technically feasible test of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle are based on misunderstandings.

Quantum uncertainty relations are at the heart of many quantum cryptographic protocols performing classically impossible tasks. One operational manifestation of these uncertainty relations is a purely quantum effect referred to as information locking. A locking scheme can be viewed as a cryptographic protocol in which a uniformly random n-bit message is encoded in a quantum system using a classical key of size much smaller than n. Without the key, no measurement of this quantum state can extract more than a negligible amount of information about the message (the message is locked). Furthermore, knowing the key, it is possible to recover (or unlock) the message.In this paper, we make the following contributions by exploiting a connection between uncertainty relations and low-distortion embeddings of L2 into L1. * We introduce the notion of metric uncertainty relations and connect it to low-distortion embeddings of L2 into L1. A metric uncertainty relation also implies an entropic uncertainty relation. * We prove that random bases satisfy uncertainty relations with a stronger definition and better parameters than previously known. Our proof is also considerably simpler than earlier proofs. We apply this result to show the existence of locking schemes with key size independent of the message length. * We give efficient constructions of bases satisfying metric uncertainty relations. These bases are computable by quantum circuits of almost linear size. This leads to the first explicit construction of a strong information locking scheme. Moreover, we present a locking scheme that can in principle be implemented with current technology. These constructions are obtained by adapting an explicit norm embedding due to Indyk (2007) and an extractor construction of Guruswami, Umans and Vadhan (2009). * We apply our metric uncertainty relations to give communication protocols that perform equality-testing of n-qubit states. We prove that this task can be performed by a single message protocol using O(log(1/e)) qubits and n bits of communication, where e is an error parameter. We also give a single message protocol that uses O(log^2 n) qubits, where the computation of the sender is efficient.

The products of weak values of quantum observables are shown to be of value in deriving quantum uncertainty and complementarity relations, for both weak and strong measurement statistics. First, a 'product representation formula' allows the standard Heisenberg uncertainty relation to be derived from a classical uncertainty relation for complex random variables. We show this formula also leads to strong uncertainty relations for unitary operators, and underlies an interpretation of weak values as optimal (complex) estimates of quantum observables. Furthermore, we show that two incompatible observables that are weakly and strongly measured in a weak measurement context obey a complementarity relation under the interchange of these observables, in the form of an upper bound on the product of the corresponding weak values. Moreover, general tradeoff relations between weak purity, quantum purity and quantum incompatibility, and also between weak and strong joint probability distributions, are obtained based on products of real and imaginary components of weak values, where these relations quantify the degree to which weak probabilities can take anomalous values in a given context.

Uncertainty relations and complementarity relations are core issues in quantum mechanics and quantum information theory. By use of the generalized Wigner-Yanase-Dyson (GWYD) skew information, we derive several uncertainty and complementarity relations with respect to mutually unbiased measurements (MUMs), and general symmetric informationally complete positive operator valued measurements (SIC-POVMs), respectively. Our results include some existing ones as particular cases. We also exemplify our results by providing a detailed example.

Since the uncertainty about an observable of a system prepared in a quantum state is usually described by its variance, when the state is mixed, the variance is a hybrid of quantum and classical uncertainties. Besides that, complementarity relations are saturated only for pure, single-quanton, quantum states. For mixed states, the wave-particle quantifiers never saturate the complementarity relation and can even reach zero for a maximally mixed state. So, to fully characterize a quanton it is not sufficient to consider its wave-particle aspect; one has also to regard its correlations with other systems. In this paper, we discuss the relation between quantum correlations and local classical uncertainty measures, as well as the relation between quantum coherence and quantum uncertainty quantifiers. We obtain a complete complementarity relation for quantum uncertainty, classical uncertainty, and predictability. The total quantum uncertainty of a d-paths interferometer is shown to be equivalent to the Wigner-Yanase coherence and the corresponding classical uncertainty is shown to be a quantum correlation quantifier. The duality between complementarity and uncertainty is used to derive quantum correlations measures that complete the complementarity relations for $l_1$-norm and $l_2$-norm coherences. Besides, we show that Brukner-Zeilinger's invariant information quantifies both the wave and particle characters of a quanton and we obtain a sum uncertainty relation for the generalized Gell Mann's matrices.

This chapter models quantum and neural uncertainty using a concept of the Agent–based Uncertainty Theory (AUT). The AUT is based on complex fusion of crisp (non-fuzzy) conflicting judgments of agents. It provides a uniform representation and an operational empirical interpretation for several uncertainty theories such as rough set theory, fuzzy sets theory, evidence theory, and probability theory. The AUT models conflicting evaluations that are fused in the same evaluation context. This agent approach gives also a novel definition of the quantum uncertainty and quantum computations for quantum gates that are realized by unitary transformations of the state. In the AUT approach, unitary matrices are interpreted as logic operations in logic computations. We show that by using permutation operators any type of complex classical logic expression can be generated. With the quantum gate, we introduce classical logic into the quantum domain. This chapter connects the intrinsic irrationality of the quantum system and the non-classical quantum logic with the agents. We argue that AUT can help to find meaning for quantum superposition of non-consistent states. Next, this chapter shows that the neural fusion at the synapse can be modeled by the AUT in the same fashion. The neuron is modeled as an operator that transforms classical logic expressions into many-valued logic expressions. The motivation for such neural network is to provide high flexibility and logic adaptation of the brain model.

The offset quaternion linear canonical transform (OQLCT) provides a more general framework for a number of linear integral transforms in signal processing and optics, such as quaternion Fourier transform (QFT), fractional quaternion Fourier transform (FrQFT), and linear canonical transform (QLCT). We devote this paper to various different of uncertainty principles (UPs) for the two‐sided OQLCT, which including logarithmic UP, Heisenberg‐type UP, Hardy's UP, Beurling's UP, Entropic UP, Donoho‐Stark's UP, and Local UP. Moreover, we also prove Lieb's UP for the two‐sided short‐time offset quaternion linear canonical transform (SOQLCT).