Abstract
wide acceptance of the conclusion that most reservoirs are at wettability conditions other than VSWW. This conclusion has led to a resurgence of interest in satisfactory proce dures for measuring reservoir wettability and determining its effect on oil recovery, especially with respect to waterflooding. De termination of reservoir wettability and its effect on oil recovery by methods that in volve core samples will be referred to as ad vanced core analysis for wettability (ACAW). Reservoir wettability is not a simply de fined property. Classification of reservoirs as water-wet or oil-wet is a gross oversim plification. Various procedures for meas uring wettability have been proposed. Two methods of quantifying wettability based on rocklbrine/oil displacement behavior, the modified Amott test 2 and the USBM test, 3 are in common use. Each method depends on water saturation measurements and re lated capillary pressures or flow conditions to define a wettability scale. The tests show that reservoir wettability can cover a broad spectrum of wetting conditions that range from VSWW to very strongly oil-wet. With in this range, complex mixed-wettability conditions given by combinations of preferentially water-wet and oil-wet surfaces have been identified. In this paper, the 'adopted scales of reservoir wettability and their relationships to interface boundary con ditions are considered together with the dra matic effects that wettability can have on oil recovery.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.