Abstract

Experimental and archaeological researchers have identified a variety of fracture or breakage types associated with stone implements used as projectile points. The mechanics of formation of the fracture types are similar regardless of mode of use: bow, atlatl, or thrusting. Even so, there continues to be some confusion and lack of standardization regarding terminology and the recognition of these fracture types. Identification of impact damage in lithic assemblages is facilitated by the isolation of both abrasive and fatigue wear and the adoption of standardized terminology. Impact-damaged artifacts can also provide relevant data pertaining to site function, patterns of weapons use and discard, and other aspects of subsistence behavior.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.