Abstract
ABSTRACT In this essay I argue that Hemingway’s much-discussed inner conflicts and self-contradictions on display in Green Hills of Africa (GHoA) are symptoms of his struggling with cognitive dissonance in view of his active contribution to the demise of the natural world he claimed to love. In this, Hemingway’s predicament mirrors that of the humankind as a whole in the age of anthropogenic environmental change. Through exploration of selected passages from GHoA and of the way they exemplify specific cognitive biases that influence the way humans interpret and respond to global warming, biodiversity loss, and other environmental crises, I demonstrate the utility of cognitive ecocriticism for illuminating individual and social (in)action on these challenges.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
