Abstract
ABSTRACT This article explores Saidiya Hartman’s speculative mode of narration with respect to lives whose only record is their judgment by power. The author interprets her insights in productive tension with Michel Foucault’s concerns about the violent will-to-know and the possibility of conveying the poem-lives he finds in archives. Hartman’s method primarily diverges from Foucault by exploring the possibilities of literary close narration, that is, “critical fabulation.” While telling stories of “the nameless and forgotten” can neither change nor do justice to what happened, Hartman suggests that exploring these counterhistories contributes to what Foucault also called a “history of the present.”
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
