Abstract
This article analyses the alternative media coverage of the 2016 Olympics from the perspective of an emerging literature on ‘platform hijack’ of media events. By conducting a frame analysis (n = 60), we explore the extent to which alternative media producers have sought to seize the attention from the Olympics to their agendas or issues. While they expectedly appeared emphasising the damaging effects over communities, results otherwise suggest no intent to directly ‘hijack’ the Olympics’ platforms, as seen in past episodes of disruptive activism. Instead, we propose interpreting the evidence as indicative of discourse autonomy, which adds nuances to the way in which alternative media producers prefer to remain tied to their local issues even during global media events.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.