Abstract
Truth and interpretation in ethnography (part 2): Discrepancies with marginalized groups and uniformed professions This essay is the second part of my contribution to an ongoing discussion in KWALON on evidence and truth in ethnography. I stress that ethnography is inferential and involves interpretation work, and in this part specifically I shift the attention from the problems of truth about the field to those in it. Using ethnographic material from Alice Goffman and insights from studies of the uniformed services, I focus on the discrepancies that result from secrecy and truth work. Relative, coherent and holistic truths thus emerge in the field. These pose special challenges for writing ethnography; deploying experience requires rhetorical strategies. The emergent character of truth also entails scrutinizing the ‘facts of fieldwork’ and steering clear of the subjectivist and objectivist fallacies of empiricist functionalism. I end the essay with three methodological tips, inviting further research into how secrecy and truth work relate to domination and resistance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
