Abstract
Gaming Law ReviewVol. 9, No. 5 Original PapersVoluntary Self Exclusion Lists: How They Work and Potential ProblemsAndy RheaAndy RheaSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:8 Nov 2005https://doi.org/10.1089/glr.2005.9.462AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byBookmakers and a Duty of Care: Customers’ Views in England14 April 2015 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2Putting Arms at Arm's Length: Precommitment Against SuicideSSRN Electronic JournalDoes Your Older Adult Client Have a Gambling Problem?Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, Vol. 49, No. 6One Decade of Self Exclusion: Missouri Casino Self-Excluders Four to Ten Years after Enrollment21 November 2009 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1Problem Gamblers and the Duty of Care: A Response to Sasso and Kalajdzic Jamie Cameron17 October 2007 | Gaming Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 5 Volume 9Issue 5Oct 2005 InformationCopyright 2005, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Andy Rhea.Voluntary Self Exclusion Lists: How They Work and Potential Problems.Gaming Law Review.Oct 2005.462-469.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr.2005.9.462Published in Volume: 9 Issue 5: November 8, 2005PDF download
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
