Visual field motion during a body pull affects compensatory standing and stepping responses.

Abstract

It is unclear whether the visual input that accompanies a perturbation of a standing person can affect whether a recovery step is taken. Visual motion speeds were manipulated during unexpected forward and backward shoulder pulls. Visual motion that appeared slower than actual body motion reduced the initial in-place resistance to the perturbation. As a result of the modulation of the in-place response, less pull force was needed to trigger a step when visual velocity appeared slower than normal. The visuomotor postural response occurred earlier and was larger when the full-field visual input was paired with a mechanical perturbation. The present study aimed to determine how visual motion evoked by an upper body perturbation during standing affects compensatory postural responses. This was investigated by rotating the visual field forwards or backwards about the ankle, time-locked to a forwards or backwards shoulder pull. Kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic responses were recorded to a range of pull forces over 160 trials in 12healthy adults (mean±SD=31±5.8years). Stepping threshold forces and in-place postural responses were compared between conditions. When the visual field moved in the same direction as the pull, so that the apparent velocity of the body was reduced (SLOW condition), the pull-force required to induce a step was less than when the visual field either rotated in the opposite direction (FAST) or was unaltered (NATURAL). For in-place responses, the body was displaced further in the direction of the pull in the SLOW condition. This was the result of a reduction in the resistive force from lower leg muscles 130ms after the visual motion onset. In trials with no pull, the visual motion induced postural responses that were later (290ms) and had smaller amplitudes compared to when visual motion is paired with an unexpected perturbation of the body. The results suggest that the apparent speed of the visual environment during a perturbation does influence whether a compensatory step is taken, not via a direct effect on the decision to step but by modulating the initial in-place response.