Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the use of inexpensive and easy-to-use hydrogel “marble” electrodes for the recording of electrical potentials of the human visual cortex using visual evoked potentials (VEPs) as example. Top hat-shaped holders for the marble electrodes were developed with an electrode cap to acquire the signals. In 12 healthy volunteers, we compared the VEPs obtained with conventional gold-cup electrodes to those obtained with marble electrodes. Checkerboards of two check sizes—0.8° and 0.25°—were presented. Despite the higher impedance of the marble electrodes, the line noise could be completely removed by averaging 64 single traces, and VEPs could be recorded. Linear mixed-effect models using electrode type, stimulus, and recording duration revealed a statistically significant effect of the electrode type on only VEP N75 peak latency (mean ± SEM: 1.0 ± 1.2 ms) and amplitude (mean ± SEM: 0.8 ± 0.9 µV) The mean amplitudes of the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands of marble electrodes were statistically significantly different and, on average, 25% higher than those of gold-cup electrodes. However, the mean amplitudes showed a statistically significant strong correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.8). We therefore demonstrate the potential of the inexpensive and efficient hydrogel electrode to replace conventional gold-cup electrodes for the recording of VEPs and possibly other recordings from the human cortex.
Highlights
Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are changes of the electrical potential elicited by visual stimuli and recorded using electrodes mounted on the forehead and the scalp above the inion
VEPs could be recorded in all subjects using conventional gold-cup electrodes and marble electrodes
This study demonstrated the potential of marble electrodes to replace conventional gold-cup electrodes for the recording of visual evoked potentials
Summary
Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are changes of the electrical potential elicited by visual stimuli and recorded using electrodes mounted on the forehead and the scalp above the inion. VEPs are used to measure the functional integrity of the visual pathways from retina via the optic nerves to the visual cortex [1]. A typical VEP waveform using pattern-reversal stimulation consists of a negative. P100 is the standard measure of VEP analysis, which shows relatively little within-subject (intraocular) and between-subject variation [2]. Any abnormality that affects the visual pathway or visual cortex, such as optic neuritis, meningitis, stroke, tumors, or multiple sclerosis, can alter the VEP waveform by a reduced amplitude, a delayed latency, or a combination of both [1]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.