Abstract

BackgroundGreat cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo L.) show the highest known foraging yield for a marine predator and they are often perceived to be in conflict with human economic interests. They are generally regarded as visually-guided, pursuit-dive foragers, so it would be expected that cormorants have excellent vision much like aerial predators, such as hawks which detect and pursue prey from a distance. Indeed cormorant eyes appear to show some specific adaptations to the amphibious life style. They are reported to have a highly pliable lens and powerful intraocular muscles which are thought to accommodate for the loss of corneal refractive power that accompanies immersion and ensures a well focussed image on the retina. However, nothing is known of the visual performance of these birds and how this might influence their prey capture technique.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe measured the aquatic visual acuity of great cormorants under a range of viewing conditions (illuminance, target contrast, viewing distance) and found it to be unexpectedly poor. Cormorant visual acuity under a range of viewing conditions is in fact comparable to unaided humans under water, and very inferior to that of aerial predators. We present a prey detectability model based upon the known acuity of cormorants at different illuminances, target contrasts and viewing distances. This shows that cormorants are able to detect individual prey only at close range (less than 1 m).Conclusions/SignificanceWe conclude that cormorants are not the aquatic equivalent of hawks. Their efficient hunting involves the use of specialised foraging techniques which employ brief short-distance pursuit and/or rapid neck extension to capture prey that is visually detected or flushed only at short range. This technique appears to be driven proximately by the cormorant's limited visual capacities, and is analogous to the foraging techniques employed by herons.

Highlights

  • Pursuit–dive foraging is widespread among birds (c.150 species from seven Orders)

  • This loss of corneal refractive power results in the reduction in the sizes of visual fields, alteration of visual field topography and reduction in the brightness of the retinal image [4,5]

  • Visual acuity was significantly effected by target illumination (Fig. 1, F5,18 = 39.0, p,0.0001), target contrast (Fig. 2, F4,15 = 10.2, p = 0.0003), and viewing distance (Fig. 3, F1,8 = 16.6, p = 0.003)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pursuit–dive foraging (taking prey from the water column or from substrata at depth) is widespread among birds (c.150 species from seven Orders). Great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo L.) show the highest known foraging yield for a marine predator and they are often perceived to be in conflict with human economic interests They are generally regarded as visually-guided, pursuitdive foragers, so it would be expected that cormorants have excellent vision much like aerial predators, such as hawks which detect and pursue prey from a distance. We present a prey detectability model based upon the known acuity of cormorants at different illuminances, target contrasts and viewing distances. We conclude that cormorants are not the aquatic equivalent of hawks Their efficient hunting involves the use of specialised foraging techniques which employ brief short-distance pursuit and/or rapid neck extension to capture prey that is visually detected or flushed only at short range. This technique appears to be driven proximately by the cormorant’s limited visual capacities, and is analogous to the foraging techniques employed by herons

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.