Visceral artery aneurysms: Incidence, management, and outcome analysis in a tertiary care center over one decade.

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the incidence, management, and outcome of visceral artery aneurysms (VAA) over one decade.Methods233 patients with 253 VAA were analyzed according to location, diameter, aneurysm type, aetiology, rupture, management, and outcome.ResultsVAA were localized at the splenic artery, coeliac trunk, renal artery, hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery, and other locations. The aetiology was degenerative, iatrogenic after medical procedures, connective tissue disease, and others. The rate of rupture was much higher in pseudoaneurysms than true aneurysms (76.3 % vs.3.1 %). Fifty-nine VAA were treated by intervention (n = 45) or surgery (n = 14). Interventions included embolization with coils or glue, covered stents, or combinations of these. Thirty-five cases with ruptured VAA were treated on an emergency basis. There was no difference in size between ruptured and non-ruptured VAA. After interventional treatment, the 30-day mortality was 6.7 % in ruptured VAA compared to no mortality in non-ruptured cases. Follow-up included CT and/or MRI after a mean period of 18.0 ± 26.8 months. The current status of the patient was obtained by a structured telephone survey.ConclusionsPseudoaneurysms of visceral arteries have a high risk for rupture. Aneurysm size seems to be no reliable predictor for rupture. Interventional treatment is safe and effective for management of VAA.Key Points• Diagnosis of visceral artery aneurysms is increasing due to CT and MRI.• Diameter of visceral arterial aneurysms is no reliable predictor for rupture.• False aneurysms/pseudoaneurysms and symptomatic cases need emergency treatment.• Interventional treatment is safe and effective.