Virtual Screening of Anti-HIV Leads from Mayana (Coleus scutellarioides Benth.) Phytoconstituents

It is not known whether the low infectivity and low virion-associated polymerase activity of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type-1 (HTLV-1) are due to the quantity or quality of the reverse transcriptase (RT), because the protein has not yet been fully characterized. We have developed anti-RT antibodies and constructed HTLV-1 expression plasmids that express truncated or hemagglutinin-tagged Pol polyproteins to examine the maturation and composition of HTLV-1 RT. We detected virion-associated proteins corresponding to RT-integrase (IN) (pr98) and RT (p62) as well as smaller proteins containing the polymerase (p49) or RNase H domains. We have identified the amino acid sequences in the Pol polyprotein that are cleaved by HTLV-1 protease to yield RT and IN. We have also identified the cleavage sites within RT that give rise to the p49 polymerase fragment. Immunoprecipitation of an epitope-tagged p62 subunit coprecipitated p49, indicating that the HTLV-1 RT complex can exist as a p62/p49 heterodimer analogous to the RT of HIV-1 (p66/p51).

ABSTRACTHIV-1 protease (PR), reverse transcriptase (RT), and integrase (IN) variability presents a challenge to laboratories performing genotypic resistance testing. This challenge will grow with increased sequencing of samples enriched for proviral DNA such as dried blood spots and increased use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect low-abundance HIV-1 variants. We analyzed PR and RT sequences from >100,000 individuals and IN sequences from >10,000 individuals to characterize variation at each amino acid position, identify mutations indicating APOBEC-mediated G-to-A editing, and identify mutations resulting from selective drug pressure. Forty-seven percent of PR, 37% of RT, and 34% of IN positions had one or more amino acid variants with a prevalence of ≥1%. Seventy percent of PR, 60% of RT, and 60% of IN positions had one or more variants with a prevalence of ≥0.1%. Overall 201 PR, 636 RT, and 346 IN variants had a prevalence of ≥0.1%. The median intersubtype prevalence ratios were 2.9-, 2.1-, and 1.9-fold for these PR, RT, and IN variants, respectively. Only 5.0% of PR, 3.7% of RT, and 2.0% of IN variants had a median intersubtype prevalence ratio of ≥10-fold. Variants at lower prevalences were more likely to differ biochemically and to be part of an electrophoretic mixture compared to high-prevalence variants. There were 209 mutations indicative of APOBEC-mediated G-to-A editing and 326 mutations nonpolymorphic treatment selected. Identification of viruses with a high number of APOBEC-associated mutations will facilitate the quality control of dried blood spot sequencing. Identifying sequences with a high proportion of rare mutations will facilitate the quality control of NGS.IMPORTANCE Most antiretroviral drugs target three HIV-1 proteins: PR, RT, and IN. These proteins are highly variable: many different amino acids can be present at the same position in viruses from different individuals. Some of the amino acid variants cause drug resistance and occur mainly in individuals receiving antiretroviral drugs. Some variants result from a human cellular defense mechanism called APOBEC-mediated hypermutation. Many variants result from naturally occurring mutation. Some variants may represent technical artifacts. We studied PR and RT sequences from >100,000 individuals and IN sequences from >10,000 individuals to quantify variation at each amino acid position in these three HIV-1 proteins. We performed analyses to determine which amino acid variants resulted from antiretroviral drug selection pressure, APOBEC-mediated editing, and naturally occurring variation. Our results provide information essential to clinical, research, and public health laboratories performing genotypic resistance testing by sequencing HIV-1 PR, RT, and IN.

BackgroundAs use of dolutegravir (DTG) becomes more common in resource limited settings (RLS), the demand for integrase resistance testing is increasing. Affordable methods for genotyping all relevant HIV-1 pol genes (i.e., protease (PR), reverse transcriptase (RT) and integrase (IN)) are required to guide choice of future antiretroviral therapy (ART). We designed an in-house HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) genotyping method that is affordable and suitable for use in RLS.MethodsWe obtained remnant plasma samples from CAPRISA 103 study and amplified HIV-1 PR, RT and IN genes, using an innovative PCR assay. We validated the assay using remnant plasma samples from an external quality assessment (EQA) programme. We genotyped samples by Sanger sequencing and assessed HIVDR mutations using the Stanford HIV drug resistance database. We compared drug resistance mutations with previous genotypes and calculated method cost-estimates.ResultsFrom 96 samples processed, we obtained sequence data for 78 (81%), of which 75 (96%) had a least one HIVDR mutation, with no major-IN mutations observed. Only one sample had an E157Q INSTI-accessory mutation. When compared to previous genotypes, 18/78 (23%) had at least one discordant mutation, but only 2/78 (3%) resulted in different phenotypic predictions that could affect choice of subsequent regimen. All CAPRISA 103 study sequences were HIV-1C as confirmed by phylogenetic analysis. Of the 7 EQA samples, 4 were HIV-1C, 2 were HIV-1D, and 1 was HIV-1A. Genotypic resistance data generated using the IDR method were 100% concordant with EQA panel results. Overall genotyping cost per sample was estimated at ~ US$43–$US49, with a processing time of ~ 2 working days.ConclusionsWe successfully designed an in-house HIVDR method that is suitable for genotyping HIV-1 PR, RT and IN genes, at an affordable cost and shorter turnaround time. This HIVDR genotyping method accommodates changes in ART regimens and will help to guide HIV-1 treatment decisions in RLS.

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and type 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2) reverse transcriptases (RTs) are evolutionary related. To study the effect of homologous sequence replacements on polymerase function and to map the determinants of the lack of susceptibility of HIV-2 RT to nonnucleoside drugs, a series of chimeric HIV-1/HIV-2 RTs were constructed. Analysis of the chimeric RTs showed that wild-type levels of RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity were retained when both finger and palm subdomains were exchanged as a unit between the two parental RTs. Analysis of enzymatically active chimeras for inhibition by the thiobenzimidazolone derivative TIBO R82150 showed that a segment of HIV-2 RT at 212-250, when placed in the HIV-1 RT context, conferred a 40-fold decrease in susceptibility to TIBO R82150. Site-directed mutagenesis of this segment found Tyr227 to be a key residue in this segment for the natural resistance of HIV-2 RT to TIBO R82150.

Variability of the HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PR) genes has been used as indicators of drug resistance and as a mean to evaluate phylogenetic relationships among circulating virus. However, these studies have been carried in HIV mono-infected populations. The goal of this study was to evaluate, for the first time, the HIV PR and RT sequences from HIV/HBV and HIV/HCV co-infected patients. HIV PR and RT genes were amplificated and sequenced to resistance analysis. The bioinformatics analysis was performed to infer about sequences clustering and molecular evolution. The results showed that the most frequent amino acid substitutions in RT were L214F (67.6%), I135T (55.9%), and in PR was V15I (41.2%). The molecular clock analysis showed that the HIV circulating in co-infected patients were separated in two clusters in the years 1999–2000. Some patients included as HIV mono-infected according patients’ medical records and inside the co-infected cluster were, in fact, co-infected by PCR analysis. Analysis of the decision trees showed susceptibility to lamivudine and emtricitabine were important attribute to characterize co-infected patients. In conclusion, the results obtained in this study suggest, for the first time, that HIV RT and PR genes variability could be a genetic biomarker to coinfection.

A decade since the epidemic of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) was first recognized, a wealth of information has accumulated on the molecular biology of the causative agents, the human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV). Of particular interest is knowledge of the viral enzymes involved in the formation of new virus particles. Such enzymes constitute attractive targets for efforts aimed at selecting agents that interfere with virus multiplication and subsequent spread and pathogenesis. Already, several agents that inhibit the viral reverse transcriptase (e.g., nucleoside analogs such as Zidovudine) have proved to have a beneficial effect on the course off the disease, but their prolonged use has been associated with significant toxicity and the emergence of resistant mutants. A second enzyme that has recently attracted attention is the virus-coded protease. This enzyme is involved in the cleavage of viral precursor polyproteins into the final products that constitute the mature virus particle. Protease inhibitors interfere with the process of virus maturation which is required for the formation of infective virus particles. Several custom-made inhibitors with a high selective action against HIV protease have been produced recently. They are nonhydrolyzable peptide analogs that mimic the cleavage sequences of the natural substrate of the enzyme during the transition state of the cleavage reaction. It is hoped that a similar selectivity in vivo may make protease inhibitors a promising new category of AIDS therapeutics.

BackgroundSeveral anti-retroviral drugs are available against Human immunodeficiency virus type-1, but have multiple adverse side effects. Hence, there is an incessant compulsion for effectual anti-retroviral agents with minimal or no intricacy. Traditionally, natural products have been the most successful source for the development of new medications. Withania somnifera, also known as Ashwagandha, is the utmost treasured medicinal plant used in Ayurveda, which holds the potential to give adaptogenic, immunomodulatory, and antiviral effects. However, its effect on HIV-1 replication at the cellular level has never been explored. Herein, we focused on the anti-HIV-1 activity and the probable mechanism of action of hydroalcoholic and aqueous extracts of Withania somnifera roots and its phytomolecules.MethodsThe cytotoxicity of the extracts was determined through MTT assay, while the in vitro anti-HIV-1 activity was assessed in TZM-bl cells against the HIV-1 strains of X4 and R5 subtypes. Results were confirmed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, using the HIV-1 p24 antigen assay. Additionally, the mechanism of action was determined through the Time of Addition assay, which was further validated through the series of enzymatic assays, i.e. HIV-1 Integrase, Reverse transcriptase, and Protease assays. To explore the role of the identified active metabolites of Withania somnifera in antiretroviral activity, molecular docking analyses were performed against these key HIV-1 replication enzymes.ResultsThe hydroalcoholic and aqueous extracts of Withania somnifera roots were found to be safer at the sub-cytotoxic concentrations and exhibited their ability to inhibit replication of two primary isolates of HIV-1 through cell-associated and cell-free assays, in dose-dependent kinetics. Several active phytomolecules found in Withania somnifera successfully established hydrogens bonds in the active binding pocket site residues responsible for the catalytic activity of HIV replication and therefore, signifying their role in the attenuation of HIV-1 infection as implied through the in silico molecular docking studies.ConclusionsOur research identified both the hydroalcoholic and aqueous extracts of Withania somnifera roots as potent inhibitors of HIV-1 infection. The in silico analyses also indicated the key components of Withania somnifera with the highest binding affinity against the HIV-1 Integrase by 12-Deoxywithastramonolide and 27-Hydroxywithanone, HIV-1 Protease by Ashwagandhanolide and Withacoagin, and HIV-1 Reverse transcriptase by Ashwagandhanolide and Withanolide B, thereby showing possible mechanisms of HIV-1 extenuation. Overall, this study classified the role of Withania somnifera extracts and their active compounds as potential agents against HIV-1 infection.

The pol genes of retroviruses encode reverse transcriptase (RT) polymerase and ribonuclease H (RNase H) domains, integrase (IN), and sometimes the protease (PR) domain. These pol gene products are translated as part of the large gag-pol-encoded precursor polyprotein processed by PR. However, the proteolytic processing strategies differ among retroviruses. In some cases, incomplete processing occurs, forming RT subunits that contain additional domains or activities. For example, RT of Moloney murine leukemia virus (Mo-MLV) is a monomer of 80 kD, whereas the RTs of avian sarcoma-leukosis virus (ASLV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are heterodimers (see Fig. 1). With the HIV RT, the larger subunit (p66) contains both the polymerase and RNase H domains; the smaller subunit (p51) has only the polymerase, the RNase H domain having been removed by carboxy-terminal processing. The ASLV RT subunits also differ by a carboxy-terminal processing. However, in this case, both (α of 63 kD, and β of 95 kD) contain polymerase and RNase H domains, and the larger subunit includes sequences encoding IN at its carboxyl terminus. The endonuclease activity associated with IN presumably reflects the enzyme’s ability to make single-stranded breaks (nicks) in both host and viral DNAs during the integration reaction. It is the presence of IN sequences on the β subunit of ASLV RT that accounts for the DNA endonuclease activity of this RT. The functional consequences of these differences in pol precursor processing are unknown. The IN domain could, however, contribute to the function of RT αβ in several ways...

A study of effects of peptide fragments of bovine and human lactoferrins on activities of three key HIV-1 enzymes

The RT (reverse transcriptase) of HIV-1 interacts with HIV-1 IN (integrase) and inhibits its enzymatic activities. However, the molecular mechanisms underling these interactions are not well understood. In order to study these mechanisms, we have analysed the interactions of HIV-1 IN with HIV-1 RT and with two other related RTs: those of HIV-2 and MLV (murine-leukaemia virus). All three RTs inhibited HIV-1 IN, albeit to a different extent, suggesting a common site of binding that could be slightly modified for each one of the studied RTs. Using surface plasmon resonance technology, which monitors direct protein-protein interactions, we performed kinetic analyses of the binding of HIV-1 IN to these three RTs and observed interesting binding patterns. The interaction of HIV-1 RT with HIV-1 IN was unique and followed a two-state reaction model. According to this model, the initial IN-RT complex formation was followed by a conformational change in the complex that led to an elevation of the total affinity between these two proteins. In contrast, HIV-2 and MLV RTs interacted with IN in a simple bi-molecular manner, without any apparent secondary conformational changes. Interestingly, HIV-1 and HIV-2 RTs were the most efficient inhibitors of HIV-1 IN activity, whereas HIV-1 and MLV RTs showed the highest affinity towards HIV-1 IN. These modes of direct protein interactions, along with the apparent rate constants calculated and the correlations of the interaction kinetics with the capacity of the RTs to inhibit IN activities, are all discussed.

Current pharmacological agents for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection include drugs targeted against HIV reverse transcriptase and HIV protease. An understudied therapeutic target is HIV integrase, an essential enzyme that mediates integration of the HIV genome into the host chromosome. The dicaffeoylquinic acids (DCQAs) and the dicaffeoyltartaric acids (DCTAs) have potent activity against HIV integrase in vitro and prevent HIV replication in tissue culture. However, their specificity against HIV integrase in cell culture has been questioned. Thus, the ability of the DCQAs and DCTAs to inhibit binding of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) gp120 to CD4 and their activities against HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and HIV RNase H were studied. The DCQAs and DCTAs inhibited HIV-1 integrase at concentrations between 150 and 840 nM. They inhibited HIV replication at concentrations between 2 and 12 microM. Their activity against reverse transcriptase ranged from 7 microM to greater than 100 microM. Concentrations that inhibited gp120 binding to CD4 exceeded 80 microM. None of the compounds blocked HIV-1 RNase H by 50% at concentrations exceeding 80 microM. Furthermore, when the effects of the DCTAs on reverse transcription in acutely infected cells were measured, they were found to have no activity. Therefore, the DCQAs and DCTAs exhibit > 10- to > 100-fold specificity for HIV integrase, and their activity against integrase in biochemical assays is consistent with their observed anti-HIV activity in tissue culture. Thus, the DCQAs and DCTAs are a potentially important class of HIV inhibitors that act at a site distinct from that of current HIV therapeutic agents.

Both retroviruses and long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons use cellular tRNAs as primers for reverse transcription during their replication cycles. In retroviruses, primer tRNA is selectively packaged into the virion, where it is placed onto the primer binding site (PBS) of the viral RNA genome and used to prime the reverse transcriptase (RT)-catalyzed synthesis of minus-strand cDNA. Studies of how these processes are carried out in different retroviral groups have revealed both similarities and differences. Although less extensively studied, a comparison of processes occurring in LTR retrotransposons with similar processes occurring in retroviruses is also informative and is included herein. For an excellent summary of earlier work on retroviral primer tRNAs, the reader is referred to the review by Waters and Mullin (83). Later reviews on this topic include those by Litvak et al. (48), Marquet et al. (54), and Leis et al. (41), while reviews providing information on retrotransposon primer tRNAs include those by Voytas and Boeke (78) and Sandmeyer and Menees (68). Retroviruses can be divided into three major subfamilies, oncoviruses, lentiviruses, and spumaviruses, while retrotransposons can be placed into two categories named after the prototypic Drosophila elements copia and gypsy (68). The replication cycles of retroviruses and LTR retrotransposons show strong similarities, as shown in Fig. 1. Both retroviruses and retrotransposons code for Gag and Gag-Pol proteins. Retroviral Gag proteins contain sequences for matrix (MA), capsid (CA), and nucleocapsid (NC) proteins, while retrotransposon Gag proteins contain sequences for CA and, sometimes, NC proteins (68). Both retroviral and retrotransposon pol genes code for protease (PR), RT, and integrase (IN). copiaand gypsy-like elements can be distinguished from each other by major differences in RT sequences (89), and while in copia-like elements the IN gene precedes the RT-RNase H gene, in gypsy-like elements the RT-RNase H sequence precedes the IN sequence (18, 73), as in retroviruses. Many types of retroviruses have an extracellular stage in their life cycle, and this is associated with the presence of envelope protein (Env). The replication cycle of most retrotransposon elements produces an intracellular virus-like particle (VLP) which contains no Env protein. However, some gypsy elements do have an extracellular stage, and this is associated with the presence of Env protein (36, 60). Some of the similarities and differences among retroviruses and retrotransposons relevant to this review are summarized in Table 1. The full-length RNA transcribed from proviral or retrotransposon elements codes for Gag and Gag-Pol precursor proteins, which in the cytoplasm assemble into particles that package the full-length mRNA, as well as low-molecularweight tRNA. In both particle types, the Gag and Gag-Pol precursor proteins are cleaved by a viral protease to the final mature proteins. The reverse transcription of the packaged RNA in both retroviruses and retrotransposons is primed by a cellular tRNA, and the resulting double-stranded cDNA is integrated into the host cell DNA by viralor retrotransposonencoded IN.

Objective: To describe baseline and emergent HIV-1 resistance to elvitegravir/ cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF) and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (ATV+RTV+FTC/TDF) in HIV–1–infected, treatment-naïve subjects through 144 weeks. Method: This was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. HIV-1 protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) were sequenced at screening. Genotypic and phenotypic analyses were performed at virologic failure confirmation and retrospectively at baseline for PR, RT, and integrase (IN) for patients with virologic failure through week 144. Results: In the EVG/ COBI/FTC/TDF group through week 144, HIV-1 from 8 patients (2.3%; 8/353 treated patients) developed primary IN strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) (n = 6) and/or nucleoside RT inhibitor (NRTI) resistance substitutions (n = 7). The emergence of resistance decreased after the first year, with 5 patients developing HIV-1 resistance through week 48, 1 from weeks 48-96, and 2 from weeks 96-144. Emergent substitutions were E92Q, N155H, or Q148R (n = 2 each) and T66I or T97A (n = 1 each) in IN and M184V/I (n = 7) and K65R (n = 1) in RT. All 8 isolates had reduced susceptibility to EVG, FTC, or TDF. Virus with EVG phenotypic resistance showed cross-resistance to raltegravir. In the ATV+RTV+FTC/TDF group, HIV-1 from 2 patients (0.6%; 2/355 treated patients; both at week 144) developed the resistance substitution M184V/I in RT. Conclusions: Resistance development to EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was infrequent (2.3%) through 144 weeks of therapy and decreased over time, consistent with durable efficacy.

Major advances in antiretroviral (ARV) therapy during the last decade have made HIV-1 infections a chronic, manageable disease. In spite of these significant advancements, ARV drug resistance remains a hurdle for HIV-infected patients who are committed to lifelong treatments. Several commercially marketed and/or laboratory-developed tests (LDT) are available to detect resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in HIV-1, by genotyping. These genotyping tests mainly comprise polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplification and population, nucleotide sequencing (Sanger methodology) of a large part of the protease (PR), reverse transcriptase (RT), and integrase (IN) genes. In this chapter, we describe HIV-1 PR, RT, and IN genotyping on clinical samples (plasma), using the LDT methodology performed at Janssen Diagnostics BVBA, Belgium (JDx), where the PR-RT genotyping is used as input, to generate a CE-marked vircoTYPE™ HIV-1 report while the IN genotyping is performed as a research-use-only (RUO) assay. The complete HIV-1 PR gene (297 bp; 99 amino acids) and a large part of the RT gene (the first 1,200 bp; 400 amino acids) are amplified and sequenced as a single 1,497 bp fragment. Genotyping of the IN gene is performed by amplification and sequencing of the RT-IN region (the last 459 bp; 153 amino acids of RT with the complete 867 bp; 289 amino acids of IN). This methodology allows identification of nucleoside/-nucleotide reverse transcriptase, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase inhibitor (NRTI, NtRTI, NNRTI, PI, INI) RAMs in the PR-RT and IN genes, which allows to predict viral response against current ARV regimens.

Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) Rev and integrase (IN) proteins are required within the nuclei of infected cells in the late and early phases of the viral replication cycle, respectively. Here we show using various biochemical methods, that these two proteins interact with each other in vitro and in vivo. Peptide mapping and fluorescence anisotropy showed that IN binds residues 1-30 and 49-74 of Rev. Following this observation, we identified two short Rev-derived peptides that inhibit the 3'-end processing and strand-transfer enzymatic activities of IN in vitro. The peptides bound IN in vitro, penetrated into cultured cells, and significantly inhibited HIV-1 in multinuclear activation of a galactosidase indicator (MAGI) and lymphoid cultured cells. Real time PCR analysis revealed that the inhibition of HIV-1 multiplication is due to inhibition of the catalytic activity of the viral IN. The present work describes novel anti-HIV-1 lead peptides that inhibit viral replication in cultured cells by blocking DNA integration in vivo.