Abstract

This paper explores how consumers evaluate both virtual and physical prototypes of furniture products. In this study, the consumers are non-technical people without earlier experience on evaluating virtual prototypes. The evaluation task was not done in a laboratory but at a furniture fair with two stands. The physical prototypes were hand-made products presented in a typical fair stand, whereas the virtual ones were actual size, 3D visual images of the products. There were 28 fair visitors participating in the evaluation experiment. The result reveals that there were no differences between the descriptions of physical and virtual prototypes by consumers who evaluated Product Properties. In evaluating virtual prototypes, the consumers came up with more development ideas than when evaluating physical prototypes. Our study proposes that virtual prototypes are useful when consumers' participation in the development process is desirable.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.