Abstract

Cloud computing provides reliable, affordable, and flexible resources for many applications and users with constrained computing resources and capabilities. The cloud computing concept is becoming an appealing paradigm for many industries including the gaming industry, leading to the introduction of cloud gaming architectures. Despite its advantages, cloud gaming suffers from unguaranteed end-to-end delay as well as server side’s computational complexity. In this paper, a novel algorithm for reducing the computational complexity and hence speeding up the video encoding speed is proposed. Specifically, by performing minimum modifications in the game engine and the video codec, some information from the game engine is fed into the video encoder to bypass the motion estimation (ME) process. Our results show that the proposed method achieves up to 39% speedup in the ME process, leading to a 24% acceleration in the total encoding process.

Highlights

  • “Plagiarism is a threat to scholarly publishing in general and to IEEE’s publication program in particular.”

  • The Plagiarism Guidelines that were developed at that time subsequently became the model for another set of guidelines, this one for an additional form of author misconduct: multiple submission of the same content submitted to other publications

  • The following is a new section approved by the Publication Products & Services Board at its November 2015 meeting. 8.2.4.E PROHIBITED AUTHORS LIST The Prohibited Authors List (PAL) provides information about authors who have been found to have plagiarized the works of other authors and have been banned from publishing with IEEE

Read more

Summary

Introduction

“Plagiarism is a threat to scholarly publishing in general and to IEEE’s publication program in particular.”. The Plagiarism Guidelines that were developed at that time subsequently became the model for another set of guidelines, this one for an additional form of author misconduct: multiple submission of the same content submitted to other publications Both of these Guidelines 1) defined the misconduct, 2) established levels of misconduct and 3) provided corresponding corrective actions, which included prohibiting an author from submitting a manuscript to a publication for a prescribed time – one to five years, depending on the severity of the misconduct. In reviewing candidates to serve as area chairs for the conference, she recognizes a name from the PAL In this scenario, a confirmed plagiarist was prevented from being named to a position of responsibility, thereby avoiding what could have been a critically embarrassing situation for the conference and for IEEE. Volunteers who use the PAL to vet candidates must remember that the PAL is a strictly confidential IEEE document, not to be circulated outside the organization

Publication Principles
Review Process
Allegations of Misconduct
New PAL Policy for PSPB Operations Manual
Part 3. Overview of the IEEE Prohibited Authors List Database
Results
FAQ for the PAL Database
Links to the IPR Office Resource Pages
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.