Abstract

Vibrotactile interfaces are an inexpensive and non-invasive way to provide performance feedback to body-machine interface users. Interfaces for the upper extremity have utilized a multi-channel approach using an array of vibration motors placed on the upper extremity. However, for successful perception of multi-channel vibrotactile feedback on the arm, we need to account for vibration propagation across the skin. If two stimuli are delivered within a small distance, mechanical propagation of vibration can lead to inaccurate perception of the distinct vibrotactile stimuli. This study sought to characterize vibration propagation across the hairy skin of the forearm. We characterized vibration propagation by measuring accelerations at various distances from a source vibration of variable intensities (100–240 Hz). Our results showed that acceleration from the source vibration was present at a distance of 4 cm at intensities >150 Hz. At distances greater than 8 cm from the source, accelerations were reduced to values substantially below vibrotactile discrimination thresholds for all vibration intensities. We conclude that in future applications of vibrotactile interfaces, stimulation sites should be separated by a distance of at least 8 cm to avoid potential interference in vibration perception caused by propagating vibrations.

Highlights

  • Four types of tactile mechanoreceptors mediate most of the sensation in human skin: Merkel’s disks, Meissner’s corpuscles (MCs), Ruffini endings, and Pacinian corpuscles (PCs) [1,2,3]

  • Our long-term goal is to advance the development of inexpensive and non-invasive body-machine interfaces (BMI) that use vibrotactile interfaces attached to the arm to provide performance feedback to users

  • We measured the propagation of 100–240 Hz vibratory stimuli across the hairy skin of the human forearm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Four types of tactile mechanoreceptors mediate most of the sensation in human skin: Merkel’s disks, Meissner’s corpuscles (MCs), Ruffini endings, and Pacinian corpuscles (PCs) [1,2,3].These mechanoreceptors allow for various haptic sensations such as touch and pressure by Merkel’s disks, skin stretch by Ruffini endings, and vibration by Meissner’s and Pacinian corpuscles [1,4,5].Haptic perception (touch and vibration) has been studied widely, leading to development of body-machine interfaces (BMI; [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]) that can stimulate the skin electrically [7], pneumatically [8], or tactilely to provide performance feedback to users [9,10,11]. Interfaces that use vibrotactile stimulations target Meissner’s corpuscles by delivering low-frequency stimulations (5–60 Hz) or Pacinian corpuscles with higher frequency stimulations (60–400 Hz) [2,5,24,25] With this wide bandwidth of stimulation frequencies available, vibrotactile interfaces can provide a large range of performance feedback information to the user. Our long-term goal is to advance the development of inexpensive and non-invasive BMIs that use vibrotactile interfaces attached to the arm to provide performance feedback to users. Many of these interfaces rely on a multi-channel setup that often use

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.