Abstract
Suicide research remains fraught with ethical and methodological issues, including researchers' reservations about conducting intensive suicide research protocols due to potential iatrogenic effects and liability concerns. Such issues significantly impede scientific inquiry related to suicide. To date, no research has explored potential iatrogenic effects of intensive, nontreatment suicide research among Veterans. This study aimed to fill this gap. It was hypothesized that participation in suicide-specific protocols would not significantly increase risk among Veterans. Veterans completed self-reports, structured interviews, and rigorous suicide-specific tasks (Study A, N=34; Study B, N=18; Study C, N=119). Findings indicated there were no significant differences in pre- and postassessment suicide risk variables (all ps>.05). Estimated mean change for "urge to harm self" was -0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.60, 0.13), -0.28 (CI: -0.56, 0.01), and -0.01 (CI: -0.09, 0.07) and "intent to harm self" was -0.18 (95% CI: -0.45, 0.10), 0 (CI: -0.17, 0.17), and 0.01 (CI: -0.04, 0.06) for Studies A, B, and C, respectively. Results indicated the respective protocols did not produce iatrogenic effects. The current findings are discussed with attention to safety-monitoring techniques that may reduce iatrogenic effects and considerations for future researchers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.