Vesamicol analogues as sigma ligands: Molecular determinants of selectivity at the vesamicol receptor

Abstract

The present study compares the affinities of 2-(4-phenylpiperidino)cyclohexanol (vesamicol, 1) and selected analogues of the latter at the vesamicol receptor (VR) with the corresponding affinities at σ1 and σ2 binding sites. For this study, the parent structure 1 was divided into three fragments: A (cyclohexyl), B (piperidyl) and C (phenyl). Vesamicol analogues were then selected to reflect structural modifications in these fragments. Consistent with earlier reports, vesamicol was found to exhibit nanomolar affinities at the VR and σ1 and σ2 sites, resulting in poor selectivity for the VR over the sigma sites. Vesamicol analogues characterized by an acyclic A-fragment showed moderate to low affinities at the VR and moderate to high affinities at σ1 and σ2 sites. As a result, many of these analogues showed poor selectivity for the VR. Replacement of the C4 carbon of 1 with a halobenzyl amine resulted in higher affinities at the VR coupled with moderate to low affinities at σ1 and σ2 sites. The introduction of a benzofused substituent at the C4 and C5 positions of 1 (compound 2) resulted in a 200-fold increase in affinity at the VR accompanied by a 5- to 6-fold decrease in affinity at σ1 and σ2 sites relative to the parent structure. Consequently, compound 2 showed 12,000-fold higher affinity at the VR than at sigma sites. Restricting the rotation of fragment C relative to B (by means of alkyl and alkenyl bridges) generally yielded analogues with subnanomolar affinities at the VR. The corresponding affinities of these spirofused conformationally restricted analogues were moderate to poor at σ1 and σ2 sites when fragment A was preserved. In contrast, the affinities at σ1 and σ2 sites were decreased 3- to 11-fold when fragment A was modified at position C4 and decreased up to 100-fold with benzofusion at the C4 and C5 positions of fragment A. Consequently, the spirofused analogues 15–19 were among the most selective VR ligands examined. Thus, the effect of conformational restriction in fragments A and B-C is to increase affinity at the VR while decreasing affinity at σ1 and σ2 sites, and thereby increasing selectivity for the VR over the sigma sites.