Abstract
Internal standards (ISs) are essential for the development and use of reliable quantitative bioanalytical LC-MS/MS methods, because they correct for fluctuations in the analytical response that are caused by variations in experimental conditions. Sample-to-sample differences in the IS response are thus to be expected, but a large variability often is an indication of nonoptimal sample handling or analysis settings. This paper discusses a number of cases of very complex variation of IS responses that could be attributed to analytical problems such as injection errors and sample inhomogeneity, and matrix-related issues such as degradation and increased ionization efficiency. A decision tree is proposed to help find the underlying root cause for extreme IS variability.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
